by Victor Davis Hanson
Shortly before the second-term
inauguration of Barack Obama this January, I wrote
the following of my worries over the Obama way of doing business:
But the untruths and hypocrisy hover
in the partisan atmosphere and incrementally and insidiously undermine each new
assertion that we hear from the president — some of them perhaps necessary and
logical. Indeed, the more emphatically he adds “make no mistake about it,” “let
me be perfectly clear,” “I’m not kidding,” or the ubiquitous “me,” “my,” and “I”
to each new assertion, the more a growing number of people will come to know
from the past that what follows simply is not true. Does this matter? Yes,
because when the reckoning comes, it will be seen as logical rather than
aberrant — and long overdue.
I ended my prognostications with the
warning, “And so a reckoning is on the near horizon. Let us pray it does not
take us all down with his administration.”
Four months later, it almost has.
In January, of course, we all knew
that Obama had misled the country on the nature of the disaster that is called
Obamacare—a bill forced through on an entirely partisan basis through
extraordinary legislative pay-offs and exemptions. The author of the bill, Sen.
Max Baucus, dubbed it a “train wreck”; the speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi
(who helped ram through the bill), claimed that we needed to pass the bill to
find out what is in it.
Obama’s first-term methodology was
in line with his history of dissimulation—promising to accept public campaign
financing before becoming the first presidential candidate in the general
election to refuse it; demagoguing the Bush-Cheney anti-terrorism protocols as
a senator as useless or unlawful (e.g., Guantanamo as “al-Qaeda’s chief
recruiting tool”), only to embrace or expand them all once he became president;
and stoking racial animosity by weighing in during the Professor Henry Louis
Gates psychodrama and the Trayvon Martin murder case, and asking La Raza
activists “to punish our enemies.” The president had a strange habit, like a
moth to a flame, of demagoguing the wealthy as toxic (spread the wealth, pay
your fair share, fat cat, you didn’t build that, etc.), while being attracted
to the very lifestyle that he damns, a sort of Martha’s Vineyard community
organizer. Sometime in 2009, $250,000 in annual income became the dividing line
between “us” and “them.” When we hear the president remind us that he is not a
tyrant or monarch, then we assume he laments that fact; “make no mistake about
it” ensures that you should believe that the president is not being “perfectly
clear.”
Of course, in January I did not know
yet that the IRS had targeted conservatives, in partisan fashion, to deflate
their activism by denying their organizations pre-election tax-exempt status.
(Do we now suspect why Harry Reid claimed that he knew the tax records of Mitt
Romney, or why Austan Goolsbee popped off about the tax records of the Koch
brothers, or how ProPublica had access to confidential tax information about Crossroads GPS
[compare the ProPublica boast on their website: “Now, for the first time,
ProPublica has obtained the group's application for recognition of tax-exempt
status, filed in September 2010. The IRS has not yet recognized Crossroads GPS
as exempt, causing some tax experts to speculate that the agency is giving the
application extra scrutiny”]?)
I did not think that the
administration would be so haughty to go after the Associated Press and monitor
their official and private communications, especially given that the source of
most national security leaks par excellence was the Obama White House itself.
Recall the sordid details of the AP scandal: the AP sat on a story until they were
given a quiet administration go-ahead to publish the account—even as the
administration desperately wanted to scoop them and high-five over the story of
the Yemeni double agent 24 hours earlier than the AP.
The AP was not first advised of the
administration investigations, nor were the phone checks focused and narrow.
Instead, the administration went whole hog after two months of phone records to
send a message to its pets in the press—secure that Eric Holder, in Fast and
Furious fashion, could always go to Congress with “I don’t now,” followed by
executive privilege and stonewalling.
Meanwhile, in Machiavellian fashion
the Obama administration had divulged classified information about the Stuxnet
virus, the bin Laden raid, and the drone targeting—in order that sympathetic Washington
Post and New York Times reporters might have pre-election fuel for
the hagiographic accounts of Obama, the underappreciated commander-in-chief.
While we all knew that a filmmaker
did not prompt a riot that just happened to kill four Americans, we did not,
until the testimony of State Department officials and the published
communications of White House, CIA, and State Department staffers, appreciate
just how far the administration would go to further a false narrative. And quite
a myth it was: lead-from-behind Libya was still a success; al-Qaeda was still
scattered; Obama was still on the global front lines condemning anti-Islamic
bigots like Mr. Nakoula, whose religious hatred supposedly had spawned violence
that even the Nobel laureate Barack Obama could not deter.
Yet in some sense, Obama won. The
IRS, AP, and Benghazi scandals were all adroitly kept under wraps for months
before the 2012 election, as Goolsbee and Reid thundered about right-wing
wealthy people not paying their fair taxes, and the press echoed a “how dare
you” when anyone questioned the frightening state of events.
Living in Oceania
And now?
Suddenly in 2013, what was once sure
has become suspect. All the old referents are not as they once were. The world
is turned upside down, and whether the government taps, politicizes, or lies is
not so important if it subsidizes the 47%. Does anyone care that five
departments of government are either breaking the law or lying or both (State
[Benghazi], Defense [the harassment issues], Justice [monitoring of phone
lines], Treasury [corruption at the IRS], Health and Human Services [shaking down companies to pay for PR for Obamacare])?
The National Rifle Association is
now supposed to be a suspect paramilitary group, in the way the Boy Scouts are
homophobes. One day we woke up and learned that by fiat women were suddenly
eligible to serve in front-line combat units—no discussion, no hearings, no
public debate. We had a “war on women” over whether upscale Sandra Fluke could
get free birth control from the government, but snoozed through the Dr. Gosnell
trial. The latter may have been the most lethal serial killer in U.S. history, if
his last few years of snipping spinal cords were indicative of the his first
three unmonitored decades of late-term aborting.
The Obama administration had decided
to shut down as many coal plants as it can, stop most new gas and oil drilling
on federal lands, and go after private companies ranging from huge aircraft
manufacturers to the small guitar concerns—based not on law, but on certain
theories of climate change and labor equity. As in the case with the IRS, the
EPA is now synonymous with politically motivated activism designed to
circumvent the law. The president in his State of the Union address assured us
that cap-and-trade will be back, given, he says, the atypical violent weather
that hit the U.S. in his term—even as global temperatures have not risen in 15
years, and hurricanes are now occurring more rarely than during the last
administration.
The government, we were also told,
would not enforce the Defense of Marriage Act, and would grant de facto amnesty
for large numbers of illegal aliens as the election approached. Enforcement of
existing law now is a fluid idea, always up for discussion For the first time
in my life, I can not even find rifle shells on the store shelves—amid rumors
that the Department of Homeland Security, at a time of national acrimony over
the Second Amendments, believes it is an opportune moment to stockpile
gargantuan amounts of ammunition—again, a sort of force multiplier in ensuring
panic buying.
Are You a Correct Citizen?
So we are in unchartered territory.
The IRS has lost our trust, both for its rank partisanship and its inability to
come forward and explain its crimes. Eric Holder wants us to believe that he
has no idea why his office was monitoring the communications of journalists,
and yet now warrants the renewed trust of the president. Susan Rice serially
misled on national television about Benghazi and so will probably be promoted
to national security advisor. Even the Washington Post has decided that
the president was lying in his defense about Benghazi (albeit with the funny
sort of childhood rating of “four Pinocchios”) after the president’s team
serially blamed the violence on an internet video, while the president
simultaneously claimed that he also identified the crime immediately as a
terrorist hit.
On campuses, the Departments of
Justice and Education have issued new race/class/gender guidelines that would
effectively deny constitutionally protected free speech in universities, a sort
of politically correct idea that proper thinking is preferable to free thinking.
If you oppose “comprehensive
immigration reform” you become a nativist or worse—and apparently are one of
the “enemies” the president wants to “punish.” The president just condemned
American guns that wind up in Mexico–implying right-wingers opposed his own
remedies of new gun control and neglecting to mention that his own Fast and
Furious operation sold thousands of lethal weapons to Mexican drug cartels.
The end of the revolving doors,
lobbyists, and non-transparency resulted in Jack Lew—recipient of a $1 million
bonus from Citibank as it both lost money and gulped down federal bailout
money—taking over from the tax-dodger Timothy Geithner as our new Treasury
secretary to oversee the new IRS. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen
Sebelius is now pumping corporations for money to help spread the gospel about
how eager we are for the implementation of Obamacare, as the government now
sort of freelances on its own—the federal equivalent of California Highway
Patrol officers suddenly ubiquitous along our roadsides ticketing in a frenzy,
in fear of their bankrupt state pension funds.
Now What?
What happens to a corporation that
says “nope” to Sebelius? An IRS audit? Phone monitoring? Presidential
denunciation as a “fat cat”? Talking points? Harry Reid taking to the floor to
claim it had not paid its fair share in taxes?
Government has become a sort of
malignant metasisizing tumor, growing on its own, parasitical on healthy cells,
always searching for new sources of nourishment, its purpose nothing other than
growing bigger and faster and more powerful—until the exhausted host collapses.
We have a sunshine king and our government has become a sort of virtual Versailles
palace.
I suppose that when a presidential
candidate urges his supporters to get in someone’s face, and to take a gun to a
knife fight, from now on you better believe him. And, finally, the strangest
thing about nearing the threshold of 1984? It comes with a whimper, not a bang,
with a charismatic smile and mellifluous nonsense—with politically correct,
egalitarian-minded bureaucrats with glasses and iPhones instead of fist-shaking
jack-booted thugs.
No comments:
Post a Comment