The Feudal Structure of the
Medieval World
The Upper Classes:
During the period of
history known as the Middle Ages, feudalism was the law of the land. It was
the basis by which the upper nobility class maintained control over the lower
classes. This rigid structure of government consisted of kings, lords, and
the peasants. Other crucial contributors to this structure were the leaders
of the church and other neighboring kings who held influence in the kingdom.
The structure first came about, and remained for so long, because of the
great size of the land the kings had under their control. The kings held this
land by what they believed was "divine
right", the right to rule granted by God and then passed on
through heredity. However, there was no physical way for a king to govern all
the land effectively because there was no quick communication system, and it
often took several days to travel from one part of the country to the other,
even in a relatively small country such as England. The king needed a way to
maintain control over his lands, even if indirectly. As a solution, he formed
a sort of contract with his barons, his direct underlings. The barons were
given a large portion of the king's land, known as fiefs or
manors. In turn, they had to pay "homage
and fealty" to the king. They did this by giving their
support to the king at all times, governing the land that was given them, and
being ready to provide troops and fight for the king when the need arose.
Often the last requirement was waived in return for "shield money".
This "shield
money" was often used to maintain a somewhat regular army.
They also had to pay taxes whenever the king called for them. Also, whenever
a baron died, his fief was passed on by heredity. The receiver of a fief had
to pay an inheritance tax. Additionally, If the fief passed through heredity
to a minor or female, the baron could wait until the minor came of age, or he
could wait until the woman was married to someone he approved of. Whenever a
baron was granted or inherited a fief, he was made into a vassal of the king.
Also, the barons became lords of their fiefs. However, the barons had the
same problem the king had. Because they governed large tracts of land, they
divided their land up too. They made the same type of agreement the king made
with them, except with their underlings, usually a trusted knight or
relative. In this way, they created even more fiefs ruled by even more lords.
Sometimes these smaller fiefs were divided up and made into more fiefs. Over
time, the holdings of these lords were passed from generation to generation.
The class of lords solidified into an upper nobility class. They felt that
they were much superior to the "common" peasants, or serfs. As a
result, The lords usually were merciless to their peasants and demanded much
from them. The church leaders often also held a great power over the people,
much like the lords of the manor. Many church leaders were active in politics
and government. For example, the Archbishop of Canterbury was also Chancellor
of England in 1381. In fact the church was really the only universal European
governing force. It was divided into spheres of influence, much like fiefs.
Each "fief" was a diocese headed by a bishop. In addition to
spiritual fiefs, many bishops were given real manors to govern. In this way,
the church was firmly entrenched in the spiritual and practical lives of the
medieval peasant. The church had a great influence over many of the common
folk. The peasants believed that the harder they worked, the more of their
money they gave to the church, and the more they served the church, the
better the after-life would be for them. The church also paid the lord to use
the land, and this sort of symbiosis between the church and the lord keep
them both with an exceptional amount of money, while the peasant sometimes
starved to death from overwork and exploitation.
|
|
Life on a manor was
extremely hard for a peasant. It consisted of work and family life.
Approximately ninety percent of the people in the middle ages were considered
to be peasants. There was a division of the peasants into free and a type of
indentured servants. The free peasants worked in their own independent
businesses, usually as carpenters, blacksmiths, weavers, or bakers. They paid
the lord a type of rent for using their small plots of land. The other,
unfree peasants lived on the land without paying any money, but worked for
the lord, earning their stay.
The large amount of land
surrounding the castle provided a means for peasants to acquire enough money
and food to live by farming. In fact, this is another extension of the fief
idea. The average farmer was given a plot of land on which he could farm. He
also got a sense of security by living near a castle and potential protection
from danger. They also had the privilege of passing their land on through
inheritance after their deaths. They had grazing and field rights around
their village. They also had right to building materials in the area. They
did not have right to hunt most wild game, however. The peasants also had
some local political rights. They often formed their own manorial courts,
called halimotes.
There, they made the bylaws that governed the villagers' actions. For
example, one such bylaw was "Noone shall enter the fields to carry grain
after sunset" This law was made to prevent grain from being stolen
surreptitiously. The peasants also enforced these laws. Claims against one
another were settled by a village court, usually of twelve village
representatives. The court was overseen by a representative of the lord,
usually his steward. However, he was an equal member of the court, not its
head. In return for these rights, the peasant had to fulfill his end of the
bargain. He was required to work a certain number of days a week on the
lord's land. The lord also had a great deal of control over his peasants,
known as serfs. In fact, the serfs were almost like slaves to the feudal
lord. He had the right to grant marriages, tax anytime or anything, and to
force them to use mills or ovens that he owned. He most often made his serfs
work his own land. He could charge them for his mill services, make them use
his mill, and thus create a monopoly. He also could force everyone to attend
court when in session. He held absolute power in establishing punishments for
various offenses such as thievery or murder, matters not appropriate for a
village court. The people were bound to their land plots and when the land
was sold, they were sold along with it. If the land they lived on changed
ownership, then they came under a new lord's jurisdiction.
|
Conclusion:
The feudal society was constructed for one reason: security. The nobles wanted the security of maintaining control over their far-reaching kingdoms, so they were forced to delegate power to local control. The peasants wanted security from marauders and barbarians from neighboring lands. They also wanted security from invading armies. And thus the development of the feudal system and the fief structure was almost inevitable. However, all this came at the great expense of the common man. He gave up many freedoms for his security. The question we ask you is: Was it worth it?
No comments:
Post a Comment