RURAL
LIFE
Rural life has been a central and defining aspect of the history
of the United States, which has transformed from an agrarian-based society to a
largely urban and industrial one. The term "rural life" broadly
describes the lifestyle of residents of nonurban areas, defined by the U.S.
Census Bureau as small towns and country areas with populations less than
2,500. Many changes have occurred in the day-to-day activities of rural
residents from the colonial period, when virtually everyone in the United States
either lived in rural areas or had a rural background. In the early
twenty-first century, less than 25 percent of the American population lived in
rural areas.
The Colonies and the
Early United States
Colonists in North America spent their earliest years strictly as
subsistence farmers, growing or making everything they might need—food,
clothing, houses and furnishings, and farm implements. Water usually had to be
hauled by hand from a nearby spring, well, or stream. As they became
established, some rural residents had surplus production they were able to sell
or use to barter in nearby towns.
By the time of the American Revolution there was more
profit-oriented, commercial agriculture. Most rural residents lived in river
areas to facilitate the movement of commodities and people, since roads and
overland transportation were poor. To make a profit farmers had to be
innovative, reducing labor needs and simplifying routine farming tasks. Where
labor costs were high and market prices low, rural farmers used slave labor.
The result was a caste system in which blacks were at the bottom of the social
strata.
Distinctive regional customs quickly developed in rural life,
partly due to differences in growing seasons and climatic conditions. For
example, tobacco farmers in New England harvested their crops in late summer,
while those in the South waited until fall. Southern colonists could do more
chores and work outdoors than their Northern counterparts. Regardless of
location, though, rural life was very isolated. The only regular break in the
monotony was attending church services.
Life for rural women during this period was very difficult and
physical. Women were called upon not only to keep the home and rear children,
but also to help in the fields and to process the raw commodities of the farm.
Theirs was a narrow focus, largely limited to domestic chores and making
products such as cider and butter to provide additional income. Women had few
rights by law and custom, and could not own property if married. Enslaved women
led even more difficult lives and were often expected to carry out the same
kind of work as male slaves.
As Americans spread across the Appalachian Mountains and along the
Gulf Coast, settlers extended these characteristics of rural life into new areas.
They increasingly came into contact, and sometimes conflict, with Indian
groups. Many Indians were themselves rural farmers, and oftentimes showed the
newly arrived farmers what seeds grew well in which areas and under which
conditions. The settlers, however, very much wanted Indian lands for
themselves. The result was decades of mixed federal policy involving purchase
or seizure of Indian lands and relocation of whole tribes. This produced an
unstable and sometimes fearful existence for both the settlers and the Indians
in rural areas.
Influences of the
Spanish
At its peak, Spain's reach included large portions of what would
become Florida, Texas, New Mexico, and California. Spain's missions of
exploration from Mexico and the Caribbean islands have been described by some
historians as the search for "God, gold, and glory." Conquistadors
sought wealth and honor for the Spanish crown. Accompanying them, or following
close behind, were small groups of missionaries. These men, most often either members
of the Franciscan or Jesuit religious orders of the Roman Catholic Church,
established churches and missions where they could gather local Indians in an
attempt to create an agrarian lifestyle and to convert them to the Catholic
faith. The work of missionaries had only mixed success.
To encourage settlement in outlying areas of the Spanish Empire,
the monarchy authorized large land grants. These tracts, often located along
rivers, were in turn divided into areas for farms, homes, and communal uses,
and became the centers of new colonial communities. Once established, rural
life in and near these Spanish villages was not unlike the early subsistence
existence of rural residents of the British colonies and the early United
States.
In more developed communities, Spanish families slowly modified
their surroundings to reflect their traditional culture, which was largely
patriarchal and hierarchical. In households, men held authority over wives and
children, but married Spanish women could own and maintain separate property
and pass it on to their heirs. Most families followed Catholic custom and
practice, faithfully attending mass and other church services.
Another critical element of Spanish rural life, particularly in
the central and western colonies, was the building of dams and acequias
(irrigation ditches) to divert river water for fields and the community. The
presence and influence of these irrigation systems, and the accompanying system
of water rights, remain a critical part of modern rural life in those
communities.
The Spanish also brought with them a rigid caste system. This
created strict separation of groups of people in a community based on their
wealth and racial background. Spaniards (espaƱoles) born in Spain (peninsulares)
were at the apex of the social strata, followed by their children born in the
Americas (criollos). Mestizos, those persons who were part
Spanish and part Indian, were the largest group, particularly in rural colonial
villages. Below them were Hispanicized Indians, freed or enslaved blacks, and
other Indians. Only espaƱoles enjoyed the privileges extended to
colonists by the Spanish Crown. The further a community was from the formal
rule of law in Spanish cities in Mexico or the Caribbean, though, the easier it
was for settlers to transcend social barriers. Many rural villagers and farmers
were unconcerned about social status or the legitimacy of relationships with
each other, either as viewed by the Spanish Crown or by the church.
As early as the sixteenth century, the influence of the Spanish
reached well beyond their explorations and settlements to affect other Indians
of North America. A multitude of European plants, animals, and diseases spread
well ahead of the physical presence of any European, creating major and
long-lasting changes in Indian rural life. Both British and Spanish explorers
"discovered" European watermelons and peaches under Indian
cultivation. Cattle, horses, and sheep brought by European settlers spread
throughout North America, especially in the arid Southwest, creating ecological
changes to streams and grasslands. Several Indian tribes took advantage of
these animals. The Comanche became accomplished horseback riders, while the
Navaho began managing herds of churro sheep for their wool and their
meat. These changes created lasting cultural influences among Indians, many of
which are still reflected in their modern culture.
The Nineteenth Century
Rural life and agriculture in the nineteenth century remained very
different from one region of the country to another and were still very much influenced
by the seasons of the year. Families rejected subsistence agriculture, choosing
to produce crops for economic gain in an effort to improve their standard of
living. However, many rural families suffered from a combination of poverty and
poor health. The supply of food was generally abundant, but included little
variety or nutritious value. The introduction of various summer and winter
vegetables, often tended in small gardens by women, offered some dietary
improvements.
Numerous home remedies for illness developed throughout the rural
United States.
The church was an important center for spiritual nourishment and
social interaction. Families made regular trips to town to trade at the country
store. Socializing often decreased from spring to fall because of the work that
needed to be done at home and on the farm. It was important to many rural
residents to live close to other family members, creating networks of kinship
in communities. These provided support in hard times and help at peak times of
labor. A family's "good name" was even good for credit in business
transactions.
By the second half of the nineteenth century, rural residents had
gained other venues for social interaction and education. Organized adult
education programs like the lyceum and the Chautauqua movements offered
programs and opportunities for rural residents to learn more about culture, the
arts, and self-education. Similar activities were later organized through
political-based organizations like the Grange and the Farmers' Alliance.
Through the nineteenth century, rural women's major roles were as
housewife, mother, and helpmate. Women were responsible for making most
domestic goods, such as clothing, and helping process farm products, such as
butter and cheese. They were also called upon to work in the fields at crucial
times such as the harvest. Slave women, found mostly in the cotton and
tobacco-growing areas of the South, were expected to perform domestic tasks in
addition to working in the fields.
Getting an education in a rural community was a great challenge.
Most farm children attended school regularly only during the winter; fieldwork
was more important during the growing season. Most children learned what they
could from their parents, focusing on domestic and farm chores they would use
when they were older. In most areas of the country, rural children often
received no more than three or four years of formal education. An exception was
in the New England states, where religious groups influenced the creation of
public, tax-supported schools to teach basic writing, reading, and arithmetic
to all children.
The U.S. Civil War ended slavery in the South and caused
fundamental economic and social changes throughout the country. A system of
sharecropping evolved to replace slavery in the South. Sharecropping often
trapped families in an unending cycle of debt. The offer of free land in the
West under the Homestead Act of 1862 encouraged many families to relocate from
the Midwest and South in an effort to improve their economic standing. Rural
life on the frontier, though, was often as difficult or worse than it had been
in their former homes. Families worked hard to improve their new land so they
could have extra income to purchase goods and services from nearby towns.
By the 1880s, the federal government had resettled much of the
native Indian population on reservations in modern-day Oklahoma or remote
corners of the West. The government forced Indians to "civilize" and
adopt the American lifestyle. The Dawes Act of 1887 mandated that parts of
reservations be divided into private property to aid efforts to turn Indians
into modern, self-sufficient farmers. In most instances, reservation lands
proved unsuitable for agriculture. The result was collective impoverishment
that extended through Indian rural life, education, and employment. This
continued to be a problem for Indians until the mid-1980s, when the development
of reservation gambling and federal support for industrial and commercial
development resulted in some improvements on reservations around the United
States.
The late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries saw concern
about rural life growing among urban-based educators, religious leaders, and
public figures. The Country Life Movement sought ways to improve rural lifestyles,
education, and agricultural practices. These efforts received a boost in 1907
when President Theodore Roosevelt created a commission to study the situation
and recommend solutions. Rural people were wary of these outsiders, and change
and reform came slowly.
New Conveniences in
Rural Living
As the twentieth century began, a series of important developments
and technologies relieved some of the isolation of rural life in the United
States. In 1896 Congress instituted rural free delivery(RFD) mail service. This
was a convenience long sought by farm organizations, and something that eager
politicians were willing to provide to curry favor with voters. Some years
later, in 1913, the parcel post system was introduced. RFD and parcel post
opened the way for catalog services, such as those provided by Montgomery Ward
and Sears, Roebuck, and Co. Now, families could order virtually anything from a
catalog—farm equipment, clothing, household goods, and toys—and have it
delivered to the farm without having to go to town. This resulted in lost
business for merchants, who saw some families less frequently than before, but
created an entire new industry—one that saw a resurgence in the late twentieth
and early twenty-first centuries. RFD also literally brought the world to the
doors of rural families, through correspondence, newspapers, and farm
magazines.
Rural delivery and increasing numbers of automobiles and trucks,
which were replacing farm wagons by the 1920s, brought rural support for the
"good roads" movement. Farmers volunteered their time and equipment
to help local road boards maintain and improve rural roads, and Congress began
funding projects for federal roads and highways, starting with post roads for
RFD routes.
The introduction of radio and movies in the early twentieth
century brought the sounds of the world to rural families. Radio programs
helped lessen the isolation of rural life, breaking the monotony of daily
activities by providing a companion to help pass the time while chores and farm
work were done. The radio also was a critical source of information: it
provided timely market and weather reports. Farmers could better plan their
work schedule for the next day and decide for themselves when to sell or hold
their commodities. The number of farms with (mostly battery-powered) radios
increased rapidly in the 1920s. Once acquired, the radio was one of the last
things a rural family would part with, even during the hard times of the Great
Depression. Movie houses came even to rural towns, and motion pictures provided
rural residents entertainment and glimpses of what other parts of the world
were like. The introduction of television in the 1950s had a similar effect in
their homes. The popularity of movies, radio, and later television brought
nineteenth-century-era educational and entertainment programs such as the
Chautauqua to an end by the mid-twentieth century.
Another service long sought by farmers was electricity and its
accompanying equipment and conveniences. Though electric service was becoming
more common in cities in the early 1900s, electric lines were not being
extended into rural areas. Companies felt that it cost too much to build lines
to farms and small towns with little promise of financial return. This changed
only with the creation of the Rural Electrification Administration (REA) in
1935. Subsidized by the federal government, local cooperatives were organized
to build rural distribution systems. Though some farmers and power companies
feared the REA as a socialistic enterprise, it brought electrical power to
nearly every part of the United States by 1950. Some families used
electric-powered pumps to establish indoor plumbing. Dietary habits and health
improved as families began storing food in refrigerators. Some households
acquired "labor-saving" devices, like vacuums and washing machines.
Historians today debate whether these machines actually made home life easier
or more complicated: because women were able to do chores more quickly, they
did them more frequently.
Telephone service for rural areas followed a similar course as
electrification. The Great Depression and a lack of interest from phone
companies slowed the spread of telephone lines, leaving two out of three rural
families without this new service. The Hill-Poage Act of 1949 authorized the
REA to extend telephone service into rural areas. Initially introduced with
party lines, where several households shared a single phone line, telephones
quickly became a crucial part of rural life in the 1950s and 1960s.
The new technologies and services did not come to everyone, nor
did the changes come uniformly. Rural residents of the South, because of their
poverty and isolation, tended to be among the last to see any of these services
or technologies. Families also could acquire these conveniences only if their
finances permitted.
Despite these changes in rural life, many aspects remained the
same for women and children. Many women still tended their butter and eggs for
extra income and continued to be the housewife, mother, and extra farm hand.
Child rearing, domestic chores, and food processing occupied most of their
time. Some women received enough education to qualify for teaching positions.
Many farm daughters took up teaching while still living at home so they could
contribute to family earnings. Once married, though, women were often forced to
give up teaching by school boards that believed husbands should provide for
their wives, and wives should not be working so they could keep a home. The
constant turnover of teachers, as well as financial difficulties due to
increased tax delinquencies because of the poor economy, contributed to
problems in rural education. As a result rural children, particularly African
Americans in the racially segregated South, could get only the most basic
education.
The problems with education and the shift away from sharecropper
systems began to change the fabric of rural residency. Government crop
subsidies introduced in the 1930s to support farmers offered the most benefit
to landowners and large producers. Small farms increasingly were sold and
consolidated into larger enterprises. Rural residents, particularly the poor
and minorities, increasingly left the country behind and drifted into towns and
cities looking for jobs and a different way of life. The increased industrial
activity just before and during World War II further accelerated these
migrations, resulting in a manpower shortage that further accelerated the
mechanization of agricultural production. After the war, rural youth were more
likely to leave for the appeal and grandeur of the cities than to stay and help
with the farm or ranch and take it over when their parents died. This trend
continued through the rest of the twentieth century.
No longer a large part of the population after the Korean War,
rural families had little political influence and even less certainty about
their lives. By 1990, farm families composed only 1.9 percent of the total
population of the United States. Increasingly, farm families experienced an
economic pinch because farming was more expensive and the returns smaller. Farm
bankruptcies were numerous in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Rural women
increasingly took on outside employment to provide needed extra income. Many
families, though, stayed in the country because they believed the values of
rural living were far better than what could be found in the city. However, in
many areas of the country, school districts consolidated to combat high costs
of building maintenance, teacher salaries, and administration, leaving some
children to spend long hours of their day on a bus riding to school and back.
Rural Life Today
Rural life in the early twenty-first century is increasingly
difficult to differentiate from urban life. Rural families make frequent trips
to town to shop, attend church, and go to school. Many states have sponsored
initiatives to extend Internet services into the country. With the
proliferation of household goods and appliances, cable TV, and satellite
dishes, there is little distinction between an urban home and a country home
among families of similar economic standing. Rural residents wear the same
clothes and eat the same foods as urbanites. Interestingly, some affluent
families and retirees have begun acquiring country homes to escape the big city
and to rediscover the slower pace and quieter way of life that they associate
with America's rural past.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Barron, Hal S. Those Who Stayed Behind: Rural Society in
Nineteenth-Century New England. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
Cotton, Barbara R., ed. Symposium on the History of Rural Life
in America. Washington, D.C.: Agricultural History Society, 1986.
Cowan, Ruth Schwartz. More Work for Mother: The Ironies of
Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave. New York: Basic
Books, 1983.
Danbom, David B. Born in the Country: A History of Rural
America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995.
Goreham, Gary A., ed. Encyclopedia of Rural America: The Land
and People. Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-CLIO, 1997.
Hurt, R. Douglas. American Agriculture: A Brief History.
Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1994.
Jensen, Joan M. Promise to the Land: Essays on Rural Women.
Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1991.
Osterud, Nancy Grey. Bonds of Community: The Lives of Farm Women
in Nineteenth-Century New York. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press,
1991.
Shover, John L. First Majority—Last Minority: The
Transformation of Rural Life in America. DeKalb: University of Northern
Illinois Press, 1976.
Weber, David J. The Spanish Frontier in North America. New
Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1992.
Cameron L.Saffell
No comments:
Post a Comment