We
can make a good start by spending money on the mentally ill more efficiently.
by Clayton E. Cramer
The recent tragedy in Newtown has finally
woken Americans up to the pitiful state of our mental health system. We
have had many dozens of these tragedies over the last three decades, and
certainly, the pattern has been clear since at least 2000: people with recognized
serious mental-illness problems are about half of these mass murderers, and it seems
likely that much of the rest had unrecognized or perhaps merely undocumented
problems. (What sane person murders a bunch of complete strangers, then
commits suicide?)
I have been banging the drum on this
for several years, and each time, someone asks, “How are you going to pay for
all this?” Mental hospitals are expensive to build, especially because so many
states have either closed or demolished their state institutions. Once built, operating
costs are substantial. In an era when many state governments are already in
financial trouble, where is the money coming from to create a safer and more
humane society?
We are already spending the
money; we just aren’t spending it very efficiently, because we are spending it
on cleanup. Drawing chalk marks around bodies, having medical examiners do
autopsies, assigning extra police to schools across the country after each
disaster — these aren’t free.
Many of these mass murderers do not
commit suicide, and trying them is expensive. The public defender costs alone
for capital murder trials in Clark County, Nevada,
for 2009-2011 were $229,800; for non-capital murder cases, $60,100. It seems
quite believable that including prosecution costs, time spent operating the
courts and investigating the crime, and the inevitable appeals a non-capital
murder trial can easily cost the government $500,000, especially because
mentally ill defendants are almost always indigent, and thus receive public
defenders. I almost forgot: because these are mentally ill murderers, the costs
of experts to evaluate the defendant’s mental competency for trial almost certainly
drives these costs up even higher.
Once convicted (even if found not
guilty by reason of insanity), one can reasonably expect life in prison. As an
example, Colorado spends more than $32,000 per year per
inmate; that’s almost a million dollars per inmate for 30 years. The spending
is just starting, however: mentally ill inmates cost almost twice as
much as sane inmates, because of the costs of mental health care once they are
in the slammer. It seems a good bet that each mentally ill murderer
costs the state $2.5 million over his lifetime. If they get the death penalty
for the murder (as sometimes happens), it will be much more expensive than
that: at least ten years in prison waiting for the ACLU to lose the battle, but
all the legal costs of the appeals.
There were 14,022 murders and non-negligent manslaughters in
the U.S. in 2011. Of these, 12,706 were cleared by arrest. If we assume that
10% of these persons charged were mentally ill (based on studies
of murderers and mental illness), that’s about 1270 murders by the
mentally ill a year (minus a few suicides among the mass murder set). We could
easily be accruing more than $3 billion a year in current and long-term costs.
How much mental health care can you pay for with $3 billion?
Of course, this isn’t really fair.
If we successfully divert people into the mental health system before they
commit crimes like murder, we will also make substantial inroads into other
social costs that are somewhat harder to quantify: fewer homeless people
begging on the streets; fewer requests to local governments to fund homeless
shelters; fewer homeless people making a nuisance of themselves in public
libraries. And I have not even considered the other major and minor crimes
committed by mentally ill people who fall through the cracks.
I found myself wondering a little
while back, how is it that I grew up in California at a time when community
college tuition was free, the University of California’s costs were quite
reasonable, and yet it was far less wealthy of a society than today? How did
they manage to provide so many services, so effectively, with relatively little
revenue? I am beginning to wonder if the problems of state or local government
that have developed over the last forty years might be because we are spending
money trying to clean up disasters, rather than prevent them.
Clayton E.
Cramer is a software engineer and historian. His sixth book, Armed America: The Remarkable Story of How and Why Guns
Became as American as Apple Pie (Nelson Current, 2006), is available
in bookstores. His web site is www.claytoncramer.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment