Is America on the brink of
economic and social collapse?
By David Solway in PJ Media
In a recent, hard-hitting article for
American Thinker, Ed Lasky anatomizes the “pack of lies” that Obama and his
party have “peddled to the American people” with respect to the Affordable Care
Act. This is no longer news, obviously, though many of the electorate still
remain in the dark, to awaken in the course of time to an unwelcome revelation.
Lasky goes on to focus on “previous revelations that periodically cloud the
luxurious fantasy world where Obama dwells,” such as, to take one example, his
admission that there are “no such things as shovel-ready projects,” and
concludes: “For a man who went to a swank private high school in Hawaii, then
Occidental, Columbia and Harvard Law School, [Obama] is the most clueless
president to occupy the Oval Office.”
Lasky’s assessment, which a plethora of writers and analysts has come
to share, seems indisputable. Indeed, Obama’s regulatory, stimulus-oriented and
redistributive economic program is perhaps the most damaging “legacy” he will
have left the American people. “The economy continues to strengthen and
recover,” touts the
president’s Council of Economic Advisers, and Obama opines that the
nation’s financial system is “safer” now than it was in the recent past, and
that his administration has laid a “new foundation” for a healthier economy.
The facts tell an entirely different story.
For America is simultaneously trapped in a vertiginous debt spiral
while relying on the binge printing of fiat money — a process known by the
euphemism of “quantitative easing” — brewing a perfect storm of decline and
eventual collapse. Of course, as Milton Friedman observes in Money
Mischief, since Nixon “broke the final tenuous link between the dollar and
gold in 1971, no major currency…has any connection to a commodity,” and
therefore, “Every currency is now a fiat currency.” The problem, however, is
one of fiscal promiscuity or the absence of discretionary oversight of the
quantity of money swamping the fiscal marketplace, that is, the unstinted
printing of the money supply backed by nothing but the happy accident that
the American dollar is the world’s reserve currency. Such intemperate printing
of American dollars to service debt load, prop up a bloated entitlement
apparatus, and generate “stimulus” projects — those “shovel ready” jobs but
only in the sense that the shovel is the gravedigger’s implement — dilutes the
value of the country’s legal tender and is viable only so long as the dollar
does in fact remain the world’s reserve currency.
But will it? According to China
Daily USA, “The World Bank’s former chief economist wants to replace the US
dollar with a single global super-currency, saying it will create a more stable
global financial system.” Michal Krol, a researcher at the Brussels-based
European Center for International Political Economy, concludes that “it is time
to formulate the fundamentals for global monetary governance.” The New York Post
has reported that
“the US dollar is getting perilously close to losing its status as the world’s
reserve currency.” If the currency goes under, as investment banker James Rickards
warns us in his new book Currency
Wars, “everything else goes with it…stocks, bonds, commodities,
derivatives and other investments are all priced in a nation’s currency. If you
destroy the currency, you destroy all markets and the nation.” “Former
Washington D.C. attorney Michael Snyder agrees, stating
that “interest rates on our debt and everything else in our financial system
would go up to crippling levels.”
Lending greater credence to the threat, the International Monetary
Fund (IMF) has advocated the replacement of the U.S. dollar with Special
Drawing Rights (SDRs); these would allow for certain assets traded in dollars to
be priced using SDRs, a strategy that would reduce the dependence of central
banks on U.S. Treasury bonds. “The dollar’s days as reserve currency are
numbered,” blazons the Financial
Times. Should an event of this magnitude come to pass, America will find
itself virtually bankrupt. Every indicator — the unlimited expansion of the
monetary base, the impact of prospective rising interest rates on servicing the
debt, a paper-thin currency, the international threat of abandoning the
U.S.-based financial system as a result of a federal Treasury suffering from
prolonged dollarrhea — will have ominous consequences. Even as we speak, the
Chinese devaluation
of the yuan against the dollar spells further damage to the U.S. export
market leading to greater unemployment (real unemployment is at least twice the official figure) — the
outcome of a failed or adversarial leadership.
The currency shift has already started to happen. According to the
ITAR-Tass
news agency, Russia’s Gazprom Neft has “signed additional agreements with
consumers on a possible switch from dollars to euros for payments under
contracts.” The oil company’s head, Alexander Dyukov, told a press conference
that “with Belarus, payments in roubles are agreed on [and] nine of ten
consumers had agreed to switch to euros.” Dyukov is a leading proponent of the
move toward ditching the dollar. In the same vein, Russia
Today reports:
“Over the last few weeks there has been a significant interest in
the market from large Russian corporations to start using various products in
renminbi and other Asian currencies, and to set up accounts in Asian
locations,” Pavel Teplukhin, head of Deutsche Bank in Russia, told the Financial
Times.
Such foreign currency manipulations, however, are a mere handsel
prefiguring the chaos that eventual reserve-deprivation will unleash.
Ultimately, one should not forget Friedman’s resonant dictum in Money
Mischief: “The fate of a country is inseparable from the fate of its
currency.”
At this juncture, one recalls the infamous Cloward-Piven strategy
of orchestrated crisis which, as the Discover the Networks website explains, “seeks
to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with
a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic
collapse.” Choking the welfare rolls would serve to generate a political and
financial meltdown, “break the budget, jam the bureaucratic gears into
gridlock, and bring the system crashing down.” The fear, turmoil and violence
accompanying such a debacle would provide the “perfect conditions for fostering
radical change. That was the theory.”
And that, I am almost certain, is the theory that Obama, a master
of presidential stealth, is attempting to convert into practice — Cloward-Piven
in its exponential form: burgeoning debt, calculated unemployment (i.e.,
freedom from “job-lock”), exploding entitlements, higher taxes for the employed
and rising costs for everyone, a chaotic medical-and-insurance state of
affairs, an unreliable currency, industrial stagnation, infringement of privacy
concerns, a green energy boondoggle, a billion
dollar global warming swindle (based on dodgy computer
models and selective disinformation omitting the many salient facts that would
discredit the AGW theory), and the continued flouting and undermining of the
Constitution.
Accompanying this manufactured crisis is an amnesty scheme
envisioning the legitimizing of an estimated eleven million illegal immigrants
(aka “undocumented workers” and, now, “aspiring Americans”) who have streamed
across porous borders to clog the welfare, housing, labor compensation and
social assistance programs, foster the expansion of make-work bureaucracies,
and, predictably, vote Democrat. As Donald Trump aptly remarked at the
March 2014 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), “We’re either a
country or we’re not. We either have borders or we don’t.” Borders, however, are
anathema to a president who has further troubled the waters by ceding American
legal and political space to foreign bodies like the United Nations.
It is not farfetched to assume that such an ongoing concatenation
of events as we have enumerated may well comprise a deliberate project meant to
inflame social unrest and bring about a civil crisis that would facilitate the
ostensible goal of the Obama administration, namely, the “fundamental
transformation” of the republic into a socialist welfare state — or a de
facto one-party system. Indeed, the various scandals that have plagued the
Obama administration — NSA spying on citizens, IRS targeting of conservative
organizations, Fast and Furious gun-running operations, illegal deferring of
certain provisions of the Affordable Care Act, the exchange of the dubious Bowe
Bergdahl for five battle-hardened Taliban insurgents without consulting
Congress, thus breaking a
law signed by the president himself — are all forms of autocratic
practice and are redolent of police-state actions.
One would prefer to regard this hypothesis as the stuff of fiction
or unhinged conspiracy theory. But the circumstances described above,
considered alongside the president’s Marxist training and Alinskyite methods,
as well as a number of new developments, fuel such troubling speculations.
These new developments involve a set of curious events within the military establishment.
As Larry Kelley writes in Freedom
Outpost, “Over the five years of his presidency across all branches of the
armed services [Obama] has fired 197 senior officers. Just this year, he fired
nine commanding generals, including General Ham, head of US Africa Command, who
publicly stated that he disagreed with the order not to send a rescue mission
into Benghazi on the night of the attacks when our people were pleading for their
lives. Retired and active members of our most elite warriors are openly
speculating that an Obama purge of its commanders is under way.”
It goes on. Obama’s gutting of
the military — changing the rules of engagement thus resulting in higher
casualty rates, downgrading fitness qualifications, relaxing military dress
code, impairing veteran healthcare, staging fundraisers not for the Navy SEAL
Foundation or the Special Ops Warrior Foundation (SOP) but for the LGBT
community — is increasingly worrisome. Moreover, the plan to
transform the Special Operations Forces from an elite killing force into a public
relations committee, as has already befallen NASA, and Secretary of Defense
Chuck Hagel’s proposal to
downgrade the armed forces to pre-World War II levels, are issues that should
concern every responsible citizen.
The normalcy
bias disposes us to disregard or extenuate such policy initiatives.
But history has repeatedly instructed us that the normalcy bias may be lethal.
“It can’t happen here” is often the prelude to it happening here with a
vengeance. For no matter how we may wish to parse or interpret reality, facts
are facts. “They’re little pictures,” says Selwyn
Duke in American Thinker, “and as with a jigsaw puzzle, if you have enough of
them, assembled properly, you can see the big picture. This is otherwise known
as being in touch with reality.” When we consider what is being enacted under
the aegis of a ceaselessly prevaricating president, we would be frivolous if
not delusional to deny the possibility that something in the nature of what
Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer in The
Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America describe
as an “attack from within at the highest levels of power” is gradually but
inexorably taking place. Citing reams of fact, they have no doubt that “Obama
is setting America on the path to ruin.”
One may hope that it is not too late to repristinate America after
the podylike boogaloo of a devastating and farcical presidency, But it is hard
to escape the conclusion that this is a president whose Merovingian sense of
anointment is belied by the sordidness of his official comportment as
commander-in-chief, steward of the American economy, custodian of his country’s
well-being, and supposed “leader of the free world.” Perhaps the last word
should go to former UN Ambassador John Bolton. America’s “biggest national
security problem,” he has recently claimed, “is
Barack Obama.”
David Solway is a Canadian poet and essayist. He is the author of The Big Lie: On
Terror, Antisemitism, and Identity, and is
currently working on a sequel, Living in the Valley of Shmoon. His new book on
Jewish and Israeli themes, Hear, O Israel!, was released by
Mantua Books. His latest book is The Boxthorn Tree, published in
December 2012.
No comments:
Post a Comment