Problems With Authority
Lawless regulators and the White House earn a
judicial rebuke.
President Obama asserted
the unilateral power to "tweak" inconvenient laws in last Friday's
news conference, underscoring his Administration's increasingly cavalier notions
about law enforcement. So it's good that the judiciary—a coequal branch of
government, in case the Administration forgot—is starting to check the White
House.
In a major rebuke on
Tuesday, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued an unusual writ of mandamus,
which is a direct judicial order compelling the government to fulfill a legal
obligation. This "extraordinary remedy" is nominally about nuclear
waste, writes Judge Brett Kavanaugh for the 2-1 majority, yet the case
"raises significant questions about the scope of the Executive's authority
to disregard federal statutes."
In re: Aiken County is
another episode in the political soap opera about spent-fuel storage at
Nevada's Yucca Mountain, an Energy Department project that requires the
approval of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The Nuclear Waste Policy
Act of 1983 requires that the NRC 503780.BY +4.76%"shall consider" the license
application for the repository and "shall issue a final decision approving
or disapproving" it within three years of submission.
Yucca has since been
infamously stop-and-go amid opposition from the green lobby and
not-in-my-backyard Nevadans and Californians. This particular application was
submitted to the NRC in June 2008.
Mr. Obama promised to
kill Yucca as a candidate and the Energy Department tried to yank the license
application after his election. But an NRC safety board made up of
administrative judges ruled unanimously that this was illegal unless Congress
passed a law authorizing it. Mr. Obama then teamed up with Senate Majority
Leader Harry Reid of Nevada to stack the NRC with anti-Yucca appointees.
Although Congress
appropriated money to conduct the review, the NRC flat-out refused, in
violation of the three-year statutory deadline. "By its own admission, the
Commission has no current intention of complying with the law," writes
Judge Kavanaugh, despite a 2011 ruling from a separate D.C. Circuit panel
instructing the NRC to follow through. The ruling also invited Congress
"to clarify this issue if it wished to do so."
Congress did not amend
the 1983 statute. "As things stand, therefore, the Commission is simply
flouting the law," Judge Kavanaugh continues. "In light of the
constitutional respect owed to Congress, and having fully exhausted the
alternatives available to us," the court had no option other than the
mandamus writ.
So ponder that one: A
federal court is stating, overtly, that federal regulators are behaving as if
they are a law unto themselves. Judge A. Raymond Randolph notes in a
concurrence that former NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko, who has since resigned,
"orchestrated a systematic campaign of noncompliance." If Mr. Jaczko
worked on Wall Street he'd be indicted.
Judge Kavanaugh then
offers some remedial legal education in "basic constitutional
principles" for the President who used to be a constitutional law professor.
Under Article II and Supreme Court precedents, the President must enforce
mandates when Congress appropriates money, as well as abide by prohibitions. If
he objects on constitutional grounds, he may decline to enforce a statute until
the case is adjudicated in the courts. "But the President may not decline
to follow a statutory mandate or prohibition simply because of policy
objections," writes the court.
That is especially
notable given that ObamaCare's employer-insurance requirement and other provisions
are precisely such unambiguous statutory mandates, with hard start dates. The
executive has broad enforcement and interpretative discretion but not the
wholesale authority to suspend core parts of laws, even ones he co-wrote.
All of this highlights
that Mr. Obama is not merely redefining this or that statute as he goes but
also the architecture of the U.S. political system. As with the judicial
slapdowns on his non-recess recess appointments that the Supreme Court will
hear next term, Judge Kavanaugh warns that endorsing the NRC's legal position
"would gravely upset the balance of powers between the Branches and
represent a major and unwarranted expansion of the Executive's power."
The professors and
pundits who fret about the Imperial Presidency go into hibernation when the
President is a Democrat, so it is crucial that the courts reject Mr. Obama's
increasing contempt for constitutional limits.
A version of this article appeared August 14, 2013, on page A10
in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: Problems
With Authority.
No comments:
Post a Comment