It is all inevitable to me
The subject is the decline of the print media.
Now change is constant to me, having
been a Marine. So philosophically, I have little interest in trying to maintain
the status quo, which will change no matter what I do anyway. I am still
"mission first" in my way of thinking, and the mission is simple news
reporting.
In my own lifetime (I am age 65
today), I have observed the decline of news reporting in the USA and the
foreign newspapers run by USA educated people. Said another way, what used to
be published in the opinion section or editorial page or even paid polls has
gravitated all too often towards the front page, and presented as news. Now
even that's fine, too, since I can still vote with my own pocket book and move
on. For example I use to be a faithful subscriber to Newsweek Magazine, which is now in its final death rolls, or so it
seems. I personally unsubscribed ages ago, and feel like I have helped
contribute to its passing. Now even that
magazine at one time was a news magazine with some editorials, vice the more
recent editorial magazine with little current news.
What is particularly appalling to me
is that many of these opinion writers want me to pay for all this lack of
simple news reporting and read their often well written opinion articles. I
just disagree, and again, vote with my own pocket book. After all, I have my
own opinions, too.
And, in fairness, there are
wonderful print media publications like the New York Times that has so many
great sections, like food reporting (to me). I can imagine many of these
employees that work in these sections are somewhat bitter at the opinion
writers and family owners running this once great newspaper into the ground,
and thus affecting their life, too.
So where do I try get my
"news" these days. I personally can't answer that today, since I am
still seeking sources I trust. This is still an evolving process. The concept
of trust, faith, and confidence comes to mind.
But I do think a lot of printed
media that still succeeds financially appears to be "tabloid" type
publications. Thank goodness
"they" still have professional standards, like sticking to the
subject. Even I remember disparaging the magazine "People" published
by Time Warner, I believe. My
disparaging thoughts were when the magazine started, and I thought then it
would never hold a candle to "Time" magazine. Boy, was I ever wrong.
I quit subscribing to Time Magazine,
too. Remember I grew up on another
standard that Time Magazine followed
then, and I believed I was reading "news" of the last week. Maybe
not, but that is what I believed.
So when often family owned
newspapers financially decline or get sold, I no long shed a crocodile tear.
They did it to themselves, and are now suffering the consequences. After all,
they are in a business to make money using the news as a method. And the
decline was probably going to happen anyway, at least as long as we have
reliable public electricity that allows the internet news to compete. Said
another way, most humans just want to know the "news" that affects
them...nothing more and nothing less.
So it is all inevitable to me.
That's my personality and pocket book, at least.
The good news(no pun intended) is that we might actually end up with better
news reporting than what we have today in 2013. It may take a decade to slowly happen.
And it will take a change in the status quo, which appears to me these days to
be inevitable.
In the meantime, many more present
journalistic people may get use to saying one phrase..."would you like
fries with that order?"
No comments:
Post a Comment