Vengeance versus "heart and minds"
as policies
Well, I have a heart and mind, too;
and I live in rural America today, though I consider my upbringing more urban
and cosmopolitan.
The hearts and minds theory is now
decades old, and still popular. It is more new world in my mind.
The vengeance idea is even older. It
is more old world, again, in my mind.
As an American news junkie, I have
kept up with it all. As a retired Marine, I still remember how I might be a
part of applying either, or both, policies.
I still read much the same is going on in the new world here in America.
What I wonder today is how it might
sort out for our future. I have gotten to point where the rule of law is a big
deal to me. Tamping down anarchy is a
basic function of any government, of all stripes, and this often implies
vengeance, or ruthlessness, or some other variation of all this.
There are plenty of bad people all
around the world. They are just a percentage of our population. I don't want
them in charge, or even running around, kind of like the lunatics are charge of
the asylum. It this makes me a rule of law type person, so be it.
In the same vein, the "hearts
and minds" argument also appeals to me, up to a point. When those that buy
that argument are willing to let the bad guys assert themselves, then I have a
problem.
Hence, why can't society have it
both ways?
Listen to the grievances, maybe even
agree with some, depending on your experience and exposure. After all living in, let's say the Midwest in
the USA, is not the same as living in the Caucasus area in Russia.
But, also, don't let the inmates
take over, too.
Now all I want to do is be safe, and
for my family to be safe, which mostly means police protection. That is a
traditional reason for a government, the taxes or tributes we pay, and the
leaders we elect, one way or the other.
If they can't, or don't want to sort
it out and balance things, then it is time to change them, that is, our
leaders.
No comments:
Post a Comment