Who Is Racist?
I am so old
that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.
Apparently
other Americans also recognize that the sources of racism are different today
from what they were in the past. According to a recent Rasmussen poll, 31
percent of blacks think that most blacks are racists, while 24 percent of
blacks think that most whites are racist.
The difference
between these percentages is not great, but it is remarkable nevertheless.
After all, generations of blacks fought the white racism from which they
suffered for so long. If many blacks themselves now think that most other
blacks are racist, that is startling.
The moral
claims advanced by generations of black leaders -- claims that eventually
touched the conscience of the nation and turned the tide toward civil rights
for all -- have now been cheapened by today's generation of black
"leaders," who act as if it is all just a matter of whose ox is
gored.
Even in legal
cases involving terrible crimes -- the O.J. Simpson murder trial or the charges
of gang rape against Duke University students -- many black "leaders"
and their followers have not waited for facts about who was guilty and who was
not, but have immediately taken sides, based on who was black and who was
white.
Among whites,
according to the same Rasmussen poll, 38 percent consider most blacks racist
and 10 percent consider most whites racist.
Broken down by
politics, the same poll showed that 49 percent of Republicans consider most
blacks racist, as do 36 percent of independents and 29 percent of Democrats.
Perhaps most
disturbing of all, just 29 percent of Americans as a whole think race relations
are getting better, while 32 percent think race relations are getting worse.
The difference is too close to call, but the fact that it is so close is itself
painful -- and perhaps a warning sign for where we are heading.
Is this what so
many Americans, both black and white, struggled for, over the decades and
generations, to try to put the curse of racism behind us -- only to reach a
point where retrogression in race relations now seems at least equally likely
as progress?
What went
wrong? Perhaps no single factor can be blamed for all the things that went
wrong. Insurgent movements of all sorts, in countries around the world, have
for centuries soured in the aftermath of their own success. "The
revolution betrayed" is a theme that goes back at least as far as 18th
century France.
The civil rights
movement in 20th century America attracted many people who put everything on
the line for the sake of fighting against racial oppression. But the eventual
success of that movement attracted opportunists, and even turned some idealists
into opportunists.
Over the
generations, black leaders have ranged from noble souls to shameless
charlatans. After the success of the civil rights insurgency, the latter have
come into their own, gaining money, power and fame by promoting racial
attitudes and actions that are counterproductive to the interests of those they
lead.
None of this is
unique to blacks or to the United States. In various countries and times,
leaders of groups that lagged behind, economically and educationally, have
taught their followers to blame all their problems on other people -- and to
hate those other people.
This was the
history of anti-Semitic movements in Eastern Europe between the two World Wars,
anti-Ibo movements in Nigeria in the 1960s, and anti-Tamil movements that
turned Sri Lanka from a peaceful nation into a scene of lethal mob violence and
then decades-long civil war, both marked by unspeakable atrocities.
Groups that
rose from poverty to prosperity seldom did so by having racial or ethnic
leaders. While most Americans can easily name a number of black leaders,
current or past, how many can name Asian American ethnic leaders or Jewish
ethnic leaders?
The time is
long overdue to stop looking for progress through racial or ethnic leaders.
Such leaders have too many incentives to promote polarizing attitudes and
actions that are counterproductive for minorities and disastrous for the
country.
No comments:
Post a Comment