Energy-Pinching Americans Pose Threat to Power Grid
Sluggish Sales Could Deprive
Utilities of Revenues to Maintain Vast Network of Generating Plants and
High-Voltage Lines
By Rebecca Smith in the Wall Street Journal
The long-term future of the nation’s
electric grid is under threat from an unlikely source—energy-conserving
Americans.
That is the fear of some utility
experts who say that as Americans use less power, electric companies won’t have
the revenue needed to maintain sprawling networks of high-voltage lines and
generating plants.
And if the companies raise rates too
high to make up for declining sales volumes, customers will embrace even more
energy-saving gizmos and solar panels, pushing down demand for grid power. The
Edison Electric Institute, the trade group for investor-owned utilities, has
warned that they could face a “death spiral.”
“Utilities seem to have concrete
shoes on,” says Elisabeth Graffy, co-director of Arizona State University’s
Energy Policy, Law and Governance Center.
Since 2004, average residential
electricity prices have jumped 39%, to 12.5 cents a kilowatt-hour and prices
for all users have jumped 36% to 10.42 cents, according to the U.S. Energy
Information Administration. Retail sales to homes and businesses still are less
than they were in 2007, before the recession.
Even in parts of the country where
the population has been growing, electricity sales have been anemic. Southern Co.
, for example, said that in the third quarter of 2014, residential accounts
grew 0.7% in its four-state region—but total home electricity sales contracted
0.6%.
Some people think talk of a death
spiral is exaggerated. “It’s indisputable that a lot is happening,” says Ralph
Izzo, chief executive of Public Service Enterprise Group, a big utility in
Newark, N.J. But he doesn't believe, he says, “the industry will be turned
upside down.”
Moody’s Investors Service agrees,
contending that regulators will work to keep utilities solvent because the grid
is critical to the nation’s standard of living. But some utilities are taking
measures to counter the trend. Power companies in 20 states are trying to
overhaul their rates so that they are less dependent on kilowatt-hour sales.
One of the most radical proposals
surfaced recently in Wisconsin. Last May, Madison Gas & Electric Co. , a unit of MGE
Energy Inc., asked state utility regulators to let it charge residential
customers $68 a month by 2017 as a fixed monthly fee for electricity service,
covering 77% of the utility’s fixed costs, versus the existing $10.50 fee,
which covered 12%. In return, the utility agreed to cut the price of electricity
in half, to 7 cents a kilowatt-hour. The proposal created such uproar that the
utility withdrew the request. Instead, it got approval to begin charging about
$20 a month, enough to cover 23% of its fixed costs, and to slightly reduce its
electricity price.
Utilities like fixed fees but
“they’ve not met with much success because customers dislike them,” says Steve
Kihm, chief economist for the Energy Center of Wisconsin, a nonprofit research
institute. He says customers think these fees punish energy-conservers and
lengthen pay-back periods for solar power and energy-efficiency upgrades.
David Owens, executive vice
president at the Edison Electric Institute, says it costs most utilities $40 to
$60 a month to serve a home. So customers who use little power shift costs to
others.
Some utilities are embracing the
possibility that customers could leave the grid. Elizabeth Killinger, president
of NRG Retail, a unit of NRG Energy Inc., says the nation is entering the
“era of personal power.”
NRG is a big owner of conventional
power plants that sell electricity to utilities. But Ms. Killinger is helping
build a side business that sells energy products directly to consumers,
including rooftop solar systems and portable devices that make or store
electricity.
In August, the company bought Goal
Zero, a Utah energy-products company founded five years ago to take solar power
to the world’s poor. It sells small solar units that charge battery-powered
devices and power small appliances. Small solar-powered battery chargers sell
for as little as $40 but solar generators cost up to $1,800.
NRG also is tinkering with
prototypes of stove-sized machines that make electricity from natural
gas—something the company says is likely to appeal to the roughly 50% of U.S.
homes served by gas. The company’s goal is help customers unplug from the grid
and become largely self-sufficient in a way not seen since the days of wood
heat and candles.
“Our vision is puzzle pieces that
fit together,” Ms. Killinger says. “And even though it doesn’t all exist today,
we think it’s years, not decades, away.”
In Phoenix, Arizona Public Service
Co. got the green light in December to compete directly with solar-power
providers by offering rooftop solar systems to about 1,500 homes in a pilot
project. Homeowners would rent their rooftops to the utility in exchange for
$30-a-month off their electric bills for 20 years. APS told regulators it would
seek out customers with poor credit scores who otherwise might find it hard to
buy solar panels.
Donald Brandt, CEO of APS parent Pinnacle West Capital
Corp. , says all he needs is “a structurally sound roof and a
customer is good to go.”
Uncertainty about the future role of
utilities is stimulating soul-searching among utility executives.
Bill Johnson, chief executive of the
government-owned Tennessee Valley Authority, provider of electricity to seven
million people, says he’s trying to help TVA remember its original purpose—not
to sell more electricity but to “make the quality of life better.”
But even as power production becomes
more decentralized, there is value in the centralized electric system, says Tom
Farrell, chief executive of Dominion Resources Inc. in Richmond, Va. To allow a
$1 trillion system to decay would be unconscionable, he says. “You can’t run a
country on solar panels.”
No comments:
Post a Comment