Impending
Japan-China war has the makings of a Clancy classic
On Nov. 23, China announced the
creation of a newly expanded air defense identification zone (ADIZ) in the East
China Sea, overlapping a large expanse of territory also claimed by Japan. The
move has produced a visceral reaction in the Japanese vernacular media,
particularly the weekly tabloids. Five out of nine weekly magazines that went
on sale last Monday and Tuesday contained scenarios that raised the possibility
of a shooting war.
One can only wonder what sort of tale
American “techno-thriller” writer Tom Clancy — author of “The Hunt for Red
October” (1984, involving the Soviet Union) and “Debt of Honor” (1994,
involving Japan) — might have spun from the scenario that’s now unfolding in
the East China Sea.
Alas, Mr. Clancy passed away of an
undisclosed illness on Oct. 1, so instead the task has fallen to Japan’s gunji
hyōronka (military affairs critics) or gunji jānarisuto (military
affairs writers), whose phones have been ringing off the hook.
First, let’s take Flash (Dec. 17),
which ran a “Simulated breakout of war over the Senkakus,” with Mamoru Sato, a
former Air Self-Defense Force general, providing editorial supervision. Flash’s
scenario has the same tense tone as a Clancy novel, including dialog. On a day
in August 2014, a radar operator instructs patrolling F-15J pilots to “scramble
north” at an altitude of 65,000 feet to intercept a suspected intruder and
proceeds from there.
Sunday Mainichi (Dec. 15) ran an
article headlined “Sino-Japanese war to break out in January.” Political
reporter Takao Toshikawa tells the magazine that the key to what happens next
will depend on China’s economy.
“The economic situation in China is
pretty rough right now, and from the start of next year it’s expected to
worsen,” says Toshikawa. “The real-estate boom is headed for a total collapse
and the economic disparities between the costal regions and the interior
continue to widen. I see no signs that the party’s Central Committee is getting
matters sorted out.”
An unnamed diplomatic source offered
the prediction that the Chinese might very well set off an incident
“accidentally on purpose”: “I worry about the possibility they might force down
a civilian airliner and hold the passengers hostage,” he suggested.
In an article described as a
“worst-case simulation,” author Osamu Eya expressed concerns in Shukan Asahi Geino
(Dec. 12) that oil supertankers bound for Japan might be targeted.
“Japan depends on sea transport for
oil and other material resources,” said Eya. “If China were to target them,
nothing could be worse to contemplate.”
In an air battle over the Senkakus,
the Geino article continues, superiority of radar communications would be a key
factor in determining the outcome. Japanese forces have five fixed radar
stations in Kyushu and four in Okinawa. China would certainly target these,
which would mean surrounding communities would also be vulnerable.
One question that seems to be on
almost everybody’s mind is, will the U.S. military become involved?
Shukan Gendai (Dec. 14) speculated
that Chinese leader Xi Jinping might issue an order for a Japanese civilian airliner
to be shot down. As a result of this, a U.S. Navy aircraft carrier would come
to Japan’s aid and send up fighters to contend with the Chinese.
“Unlike Japan, the U.S. military
would immediately respond to a radar lock-on threat by shooting down the
Chinese planes,” asserts military analyst Mitsuhiro Sera. “It would naturally
regard an aircraft flying overhead as hostile. They would shoot at it even if
that were to risk discrediting the Obama administration.”
“With the creation of Japan’s
National Security Council on Dec. 4, Japan-U.S. solidarity meets a new era,” an
unnamed diplomatic source told Shukan Gendai. “If a clash were to occur between
the U.S. and China, it would be natural for the Self-Defense Forces to provide
backup assistance. This was confirmed at the ‘two-plus-two’ meeting on Oct. 3.”
“China is bent on wresting the
Senkakus away from Japan, and if Japan dispatches its Self-Defense Forces,
China will respond with naval and air forces,” Saburo Takai predicts in Flash.
“In the case of an incursion by irregular forces, that would make it more
difficult for the U.S. to become involved. Japan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs
would protest through diplomatic channels, but China would attempt to present
its takeover as a fait accompli.
“China fears a direct military
confrontation with the U.S.,” Takai adds. “A few days ago, two U.S. B-52s
transited the ADIZ claimed by China, but the flights were not for any vague
purpose. I suppose the Chinese tracked the flights on their radar, but the
B-52s have electronic detection functions that can identify radar frequencies,
wavelength and source of the signals. These flights are able to lay bare
China’s air defense systems. It really hits home to the Chinese that they can’t
project their military power.”
Which side, wonders Shukan Gendai,
will respond to a provocation by pulling the trigger? The game of chicken
between two great superpowers is about to begin.
No comments:
Post a Comment