By Wind Goodfriend in Discover
Magazine
I’m
completely obsessed with The Hunger Games. I’m not sure why. Maybe it’s
because I have visited North Korea, a real country where millions of people
really are dying of hunger. Maybe it’s the ironic meta-experience of watching
the movie’s violence on a huge screen, when the movie’s point is that people
shouldn’t watch violence on a huge screen. Regardless, The Hunger Games
is chock-full of possible psychological analysis. Today I’m focusing on the
fascinatingly weird emotions that spark between the The Hunger Games’
two main protagonists, Peeta and Katniss.
At
home, Katniss has a boyfriend, a young man named Gale. He has rugged good
looks, he’s brave, and they are perfectly matched in many ways. Both Katniss
and Gale fight against the system in their own way (which is increasingly seen
as the trilogy continues), and he is always successful at making Katniss feel
comforted in a world with no comforts.
So why
does Katniss later fall for Peeta? Peeta certainly has lovable qualities – he’s
smart, nurturing, and can frost a cake like nobody’s business – but he and
Katniss are not exactly a natural pair. Their personalities clash, their goals
in life are different, and Katniss really isn’t interested in any kind of
frivolous romance. Sure, in the first movie she is ambivalent about her
feelings for Peeta, the kind-hearted boy with a sexy baby-faced look. But
psychology would have predicted their blossoming feelings for each other due to
their experiences together in the Hunger Games. It’s all because of a
phenomenon called misattribution of arousal.
The Bridge Experiment
In a classic social psychology study conducted in 1974, a
female experimenter waited around next to two bridges. One of the bridges was
low and sturdy – very safe. The other bridge was “shaky” and high – you know,
like one of those bridges in Indiana Jones, where you’re constantly afraid that
the wooden boards and ropes will break and you’ll fall to your death. Whenever
a man would cross one of these bridges, the woman would pretend to be
interested in their answers to a series of questions. But the study was really
all about whether the men would be physically attracted to the woman, which the
researchers measured by recording how many of the male bridge-crossers called the
woman later.
You can
probably predict what happened in this study: More men called the woman from
the group that had crossed the shaky, scary bridge. Why did that happen? The
woman was the same in both conditions. The answer, according to Dutton and Aron
(and tons of later researchers who have tested this phenomenon in other ways),
is the misattribution of arousal. Here’s how it works…
When
you’re in an environment that causes you to experience physiological arousal,
your body goes crazy: your heartbeat increases, your blood pressure goes up,
and you start sweating. Now, think about what happens to your body when you’re
talking to a very attractive, sexy person. Your heartbeat increases, your blood
pressure goes up, and you start sweating.
So the
researchers argued that, because we experience these physiological symptoms of
arousal in several different settings, sometimes our cognitive interpretation
of the symptoms can be incorrect. You might be scared or anxious and mistakenly
interpret the signs as being attracted to someone who happens to be around. For
the men on the shaky bridge, they thought they were attracted to the female
experimenter – so they called her; this happened significantly more times than
the men on the safe bridge who were looking at the exact same woman.
Anxiety and Arousal
So,
back to the main point: The Hunger Games. Peeta and Katniss are
certainly in a scary environment. They’re surrounded by twenty-two other
teenagers who are literally trying to kill them as soon as possible. They are
both wounded; they could die at any moment. Adrenaline is pumping through them.
According to misattribution of arousal, this physiological arousal could be
mistaken for sexual arousal. Peeta and Katniss will fall in love.
Because
I’ve read the books, I can tell you that we’ll see this pattern come back in
the second movie as well (although I don’t want to give too much away, as I
hate spoilers). Katniss is constantly around Peeta in times of physical stress.
The Hunger Games is like a shaky bridge, made a zillion times worse. She
almost couldn’t help becoming attracted to him, even if she wouldn’t have been
under other circumstances.
I’m
excited to see the next movie. My advice to readers, of course, is that if
you’re going on a date and you want your date to like you, there’s always
psychological manipulation in your romantic toolkit. Take your date to a scary
environment, like a horror movie, haunted house, or a roller coaster. These
environments will get your date’s body racing, and he or she might become more
attracted to you! Those are probably better options than hiring a couple dozen
teenagers to try to murder your date. ’Cause I feel like that could go wrong in
a lot of different ways.
Wind
Goodfriend, Ph.D., is a social psychologist at Buena Vista University, with
research expertise on stereotypes and on romantic relationships.
No comments:
Post a Comment