Heritage
Of The German Pioneers In Franklin County, VA
By Dr. Frank B. Hurt © 1985
Dr. Frank B. Hurt is a native of Franklin County,
Virginia and a descendant of some of its earliest settlers.
The, following excerpt is taken from Dr. Hurt's book,
THE HERITAGE OF THE GERMAN PIONEERS IN FRANKLIN COUNTY. I must admit, it wasn't
an easy decision which part to print. There were so many interesting things in
this book to choose from - The Carolina Road section (which was the main
pathway of most settlers coming from Pennsylvania and points north to North
Carolina). This section tells of the Moravian migration to Bethabra and Old
Salem, North Carolina. Another section of the book describes the Brethren Churches
and other religions in this area. There are several churches, such as The Brick
Church in Franklin County, still standing on the sites of the original
churches.
I finally made a decision. The following is from the
chapter about "The Character of the German Communities."
There were few taverns until late into the eighteenth
century. Travelers passing through the countryside, sought private housing.
Hospitality was freely offered and generously accepted. Travel by horseback or
on foot over roads that were poorly marked and subject to the vicissitudes of
nature did not offer "rest to the weary" sojourner. All guests ate at
the same table as did the members of the family, and often slept four in a room
regardless of acquaintance, social position or sex. "Bundling was not
unknown, and was sometimes practiced as a phase of the parsimony and paucity of
accommodations.
The carriages of middle-eighteenth century vintage had
no springs. Being placed merely on braces of wood or leather, jolting over
rough roads proved necessarily back-breaking. The stream crossings were
difficult, the fords were deep and often unmarked, necessitating now and then
resort to canoes. At the stream crossing, it was not unusual to see a vehicle
set onto two canoes, and ferried to the distant shore. It was customary for the
horses to swim.
It was a tradition for the women to run the household.
The solidarity of the home brought out those sterling qualities that
characterized the Dutch (Duetsche derived from the German, "Deutsch"
land meaning folk land) family. The winter season provided opportunities to
manufacture not only utilities for the house, but implements for the farm.
Necessities such as salt, sugar, coffee, and other potpourri had to come from
outside. Almost every article that was consumed, worn, or used, was produced
within the immediate community. Such articles as beef, bacon, flour, meal, and
soap came from the immediate neighborhood. The women of that day "…[were]
very civil and [showed] nothing of suggestiveness or immodesty in her carriage,
and yet she [carried] a gun in the woods and [killed] a deer, turkeys, etc.,
and [shot down] wild cattle, [tied] hogs...and [performed] the most manful
exercises." The proclivities of the male, however, occupied a position of
prerogative as attested by a relevant saying "The plowman that raiseth
Grain is more serviceable to Mankind, than the Painter who draws only to please
the Eye." (From "A History Of American Life", Arthur Schlesinger
and Dixon Ryan Fox, MacMillan Company, New York, 1933, pages 92 and 141.)
Throughout
the years of migration, the Dutch family retained its sense of solidarity. This
strongly ingrained trait was manifest in their homemaking instinct that has
abided the years. Although the influence of the environment under conditions of
frontier existence was not always favorable, the family was strengthened as a
social, economic and religious unit. The lack of accumulated resources,
scarcity of labor and requirements of social adaptation emphasized a demanding
degree of inter-dependence and cooperation. The opportunity to acquire land,
however, became an underlying ambition as reflected in the agricultural economy
of the Dutch farmer along the river valleys.
No comments:
Post a Comment