Attacking Achievement
New York's
mayor, Bill de Blasio, like so many others who call themselves
"progressive," is gung-ho to solve social problems. In fact, he is
currently on a crusade to solve an educational problem that doesn't exist, even
though there are plenty of other educational problems that definitely do exist.
The
non-existent problem is the use of tests to determine who gets admitted to the
city's three most outstanding public high schools -- Stuyvesant, Bronx Science
and Brooklyn Tech. These admissions tests have been used for generations, and
the students in these schools have had spectacular achievements for
generations.
These
achievements include many Westinghouse Science awards, Intel Science awards and
-- in later life -- Pulitzer Prizes and multiple Nobel Prizes. Graduates of
Bronx Science alone have gone on to win five Nobel Prizes in physics alone.
There are Nobel Prize winners from Stuyvesant and Brooklyn Tech as well.
"If it
ain't broke, don't fix it" is a motto that Mayor de Blasio and many other
activist politicians pay no attention to. He is also out to curtail charter
schools, which include schools that have achieved outstanding education results
for poor minority students, who cannot get even adequate results in all too
many of the other public schools.
What is wrong
with charter schools and with elite high schools like Stuyvesant, Bronx Science
and Brooklyn Tech? Despite their educational achievements, they have political
problems.
The biggest
political problem is that the teachers' unions don't like them -- and the
teachers' unions are the 800-pound gorilla among the special interests in Bill
de Blasio's Democratic Party.
The next
biggest political problem is that people who don't pass the tests for the elite
public high schools don't want to have to pass tests to get in.
Their politicians
have been denouncing these admissions tests for decades, and so have various
other ethnic community "leaders." These include spokesmen for
"civil rights" organizations, who think their civil rights include
getting into these elite schools, whether they qualify or not.
Finally, there
are the intelligentsia, who all too often equate achievement with privilege. In
times past, such people called Stuyvesant "a free prep school for
Jews" and "a privileged little ivory tower."
That was
clever, but cleverness is not wisdom. Back in those days, Jewish youngsters
were over-represented among the students at all three elite public high
schools. Today it is Asian students who are a majority at those same schools --
more than twice as many Asians as whites in all three schools.
Black and
Hispanic students are rare at all three elite public high schools, and becoming
rarer.
Many among the
intelligentsia and politicians express astonishment that the ethnic makeup of
these schools is so different from the demographic makeup of the city.
But such
differences between groups are common in countries around the world. But in
each country there are people who say that it is strange -- and demand a
"solution" to this "problem."
In Malaysia,
for example, before group quotas were established at the country's
universities, students from the Chinese minority earned more than 400
engineering degrees in the 1960s, while students from the Malay majority earned
just 4.
When a
university was established in 19th century Romania, there were more German
students than Romanian students, and most of the professors were German. The
same was true for most of the 19th century when a university was established in
Estonia.
In none of
these cases did the group that was over-represented have any power to
discriminate against groups that were under-represented.
If racism is
the reason why there are so few blacks in Stuyvesant High School, why were
blacks a far higher proportion in Stuyvesant in earlier times, as far back as
1938? Was there less racism in 1938? Was there less poverty among blacks in
1938?
We know that
there were far fewer black children raised in single-parent homes back then and
there was far less social degeneracy represented by things like gangsta rap. If
Mayor de Blasio wants to solve real problems, let him take these on.
Thomas Sowell was born in North Carolina and grew up
in Harlem. As with many others in his neighborhood, Thomas Sowell left home
early and did not finish high school. The next few years were difficult ones,
but eventually he joined the Marine Corps and became a photographer in the
Korean War. After leaving the service, Thomas Sowell entered Harvard
University, worked a part-time job as a photographer and studied the science
that would become his passion and profession: economics.
After graduating magna cum laude from Harvard
University (1958), Thomas Sowell went on to receive his master's in economics
from Columbia University (1959) and a doctorate in economics from the
University of Chicago (1968).
In the early '60s, Sowell held jobs as an economist
with the Department of Labor and AT&T. But his real interest was in
teaching and scholarship. In 1965, at Cornell University, Sowell began the
first of many professorships. Thomas Sowell's other teaching assignments
include Rutgers University, Amherst College, Brandeis University and the
University of California at Los Angeles, where he taught in the early '70s and
also from 1984 to 1989.
Thomas Sowell has published a large volume of writing.
His dozen books, as well as numerous articles and essays, cover a wide range of
topics, from classic economic theory to judicial activism, from civil rights to
choosing the right college. Moreover, much of his writing is considered
ground-breaking -- work that will outlive the great majority of scholarship
done today.
Though Thomas Sowell had been a regular contributor to
newspapers in the late '70s and early '80s, he did not begin his career as a
newspaper columnist until 1984. George F. Will's writing, says Sowell, proved
to him that someone could say something of substance in so short a space (750
words). And besides, writing for the general public enables him to address the
heart of issues without the smoke and mirrors that so often accompany academic
writing.
In 1990, he won the prestigious Francis Boyer Award,
presented by The American Enterprise Institute.
Currently Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the
Hoover Institute in Stanford, Calif.
No comments:
Post a Comment