Warning: Many of Hollywood’s Movies Are Fiction
With various countries expressing
outrage over movie inaccuracies, Joe Queenan points out the surprising
fictional basis of many of Hollywood’s films
By Joe Queenan in the Wall Street Journal
Hollywood has come under
unprecedented criticism for blatant distortions of the historical record in
recent films. The Egyptians have banned “Exodus: Gods and Kings” because of national outrage over various historical
inaccuracies, including the suggestion that Jews played a pivotal role in the
building of the Pyramids.
Astrophysicists say that some
scientific theories delineated in “Interstellar” and “Gravity” are ridiculous,
positing all sorts of absurdities about black holes and parallel solar systems
and reconfiguring the fabric of time. Nor is it even slightly possible that
someone with an accent like Michael Caine ’s in “Interstellar” could ever spearhead a top-secret NASA mission. Things
like that just don’t happen in the world of science. The scientific community
has rules.
Were these the only instances of
movies taking liberties with the truth, the whole thing could be dismissed as a
tempest in a teapot. This is not the case. Some Chinese critics have taken the
makers of the controversial film “The Interview” to task for misrepresentations about life in North Korea.
Numerous historians have objected to the negative portrayal of LBJ in “Selma,” and the Iranians are still livid about the two “300”
movies, which make Xerxes’s previously invincible Persian army seem inept,
overly flamboyant and a wee bit camp.
Many other films should provoke
similar ire, but they have eluded serious criticism thus far.
“The Hobbit: The Battle
of the Five Armies” is a tissue of lies; no one
seriously believes that a tiny contingent of dwarves could defeat a horde of
Orcs, no matter how feisty they were. The stupid science depicted in “Lucy”
suggests that human beings can transmute themselves into different entities
just by ingesting the right chemicals. Pharmaceutical experts will tell you
that if people could actually do this, Charlie Sheen would
have already done it.
Many more movies have played fast
and loose with the facts. The relationship between a human being and a machine,
as depicted in “Her,” is not possible. The urban flying sequences in “Birdman,” as any aeronautics buff worth his salt will tell you, are
preposterous. “22 Jump Street” paints a misleading image of the New Orleans Police
Department. The NOPD does not hire people like Jonah Hill. It, too, has rules.
Whenever a film’s credits contain
the words “Inspired by Actual Events” or “Based on a True Story,” you can rest
assured that what you are about to see is a baldfaced lie. Such cavalier
disregard for the truth is nothing new: William Wallace (“Braveheart”) never
met his screen lover Princess Isabella of France, so the saga of the mighty
Scottish warrior, as depicted by Mel Gibson, is woefully inaccurate.
But 2014 was a banner year for
falsehood on the big screen. Apes cannot fire machine guns, certainly not while
mounted on thundering steeds. This is why Earth remains our planet, not theirs.
None of the events depicted in “The Grand Budapest
Hotel” are true. Maleficent was not a nice
person, no matter what the movie claims. There is no such thing as a boxtroll.
There are not a million ways to die in the West. There are not a million ways
to die anywhere. There are only about 350.
The most egregious departure from
what laymen and experts alike call “reality” is the recent Kevin Costner
vehicle “Draft Day.” It advances the premise that the Cleveland Browns could
use their draft picks wisely. What Hollywood has to say about the Jews working
on the Pyramids may be true. Perhaps the New Orleans Police Department might
one day hire someone like Jonah Hill to infiltrate a drug ring. Someone with a
Cockney accent could conceivably take over NASA. But to suggest that the
Cleveland Browns’ management could ever make the right decision on Draft Day is
completely and utterly absurd.
Poster’s
comments:
1)
Movies
are for the entertainment of the audience.
2)
Many
people know this. Unfortunately many other people do not know this.
3)
Learning
“true” history is often difficult and time consuming.
4)
Dumbing
down a population can happen many ways. So for those who get their history
through the movies they watch, good luck.
5)
Even
on TV news these days, all too often the most inaccurate statements are made by
the “newsreaders”.
No comments:
Post a Comment