Why does no-one RSVP to invites anymore?
It seems that replying to invitations has gone out
of fashion. One party-host offers tips on how to get a response
|
By Ben West in The Telegraph
In December, my partner Sonja and I
held a Christmas party at our London home. After weeks of planning, what struck
us as the most challenging aspect of the whole event was not how much to spend
on wine, what music to play or whom to invite from the minefield of people who
were not on speaking terms, but how difficult it was to simply get people to
let us know whether they wanted to come or not. I wasn’t in possession of an
accurate guest list until the party’s end.
We sent out 65 invitations via
email, mobile text, Facebook message and the post. Two weeks before the event
only 18 people had replied. One of these had, infuriatingly, asked who else
would be at the party before confirming his decision. It made me feel I was
expected to sell the party to him, if I were to be graced with his presence.
Others among the 18 responded with a
“maybe”, an equally maddening reply. I accept that some people genuinely may
not know their plans until very late in the day – their work may entail
short-notice travel or they could have responsibilities such as caring for a
relative or child – but when someone says they “hope” to be there you can’t help
concluding that they are hanging on in case something better comes along.
The feeble response surprised Sonja,
who is Swiss: “We Swiss have the picture that Brits are so polite, but it’s not
true.”
Why people think it is OK to
completely ignore a party RSVP these days is beyond me. I’d invited everyone on
my list because I cared about their presence there. As hosts, we were prepared
to spend a great deal of time, effort, energy and money making sure we people
would enjoy themselves. All my guests had to do in return was rattle off a
quick “I’d love to come” or a “thanks, but no thanks”.
Being British, that was all we
required – unlike in Los Angeles, where you can imagine why a typical RSVP,
which comes complete with enough questions about dietary requirements as the
average GCSE, might put people off.
It puzzles me why so many people do
not realise that no answer is not an answer. It could mean you have not
received the invitation, or have forgotten about it. It could also mean you’re
lying dead on your kitchen floor and no one knows because your rudeness has
cost you most of your friends.
I considered chasing up the
non-responders with telephone calls, but that felt like begging. If I had to
plead for an answer to the invitation, I felt, perhaps I had made a mistake in
asking the person in the first place. I wondered whether their silence was
simply a polite way of saying, “I’d rather bang nails in my head than fall
victim to your sorry idea of a party.”
I then wondered whether some people
didn’t actually understand what RSVP means. Some people consider “RSVP” to be a
bit pretentious, yet it is really nothing more than a shorthand way of saying
“Please indicate whether you can attend so I can plan the amount of food and
drink we will need”. Perhaps we should have opted instead for the clear and
simple “Please let us know if you’re coming by the 5th of next month, we’re not
bloody telepathic”, in big letters instead.
Reflecting on the RSVP silence, I
began to consider the etiquette of modern invitations.
“One of the most time-consuming
elements running up to a wedding is chasing up replies,” I was told by Sarah
Haywood, a wedding planner. “It is very tiresome. Ten years ago it would have
been rare to chase RSVPs, now it is commonplace. People simply aren’t so polite
now. I wrote to thank someone for a dinner the other day and the host said I
was the only person who bothered to.”
Perhaps, I wondered, it is the less
tangible nature of digital invitations that is to blame. The online invitation
creation website evite.com
claims to facilitate the sending of more than 25,000
invitations every hour. If the
response to my party is anything to go by, there must be an awful lot of irate
hosts out there.
The proliferation of social media
means that people receive more invitations than ever nowadays. Email invites can
get lost in the sea of Viagra-related spam. Facebook event invitations have to
compete with requests to start a virtual farm or other such drivel. You can
send out an invitation to all your Facebook friends in seconds and the ease of
this means that invitations do not receive anything like the gravitas a printed
invitation by post once had.
Perhaps a formal, old-fashioned
“stiffy” is the only way to elicit a response?
“A cool-looking invitation gets
people excited, and then they are more likely to reply,” says Johnny Roxburgh,
director of The Admirable Crichton, party designers for the likes of Prince
Charles and Nigella Lawson.
As the date of our party grew
nearer, some more replies trickled in. I eventually bought what I assumed would
be rather more food and drink than would be necessary, reasoning that it would
be better to be lumbered with too much afterwards than run out of vol-au-vents
or drinks half way through.
On the day of the party I still
hadn’t heard from many of my invitees, and by this time I had lost interest in
exactly who would turn up. Just as well, as some people who hadn’t RSVP’d
appeared on the doorstep, and others who had said they would attend did not.
One guy who had confirmed his
attendance had insisted on a gluten-free option, so we obliged. He didn’t show
up.
Jonny Roxburgh thinks I should have
put my foot down, and not allowed guests who hadn’t RSVP’d into my home.
“Generally, if you haven’t replied, you really shouldn’t go,” he says.
Many people think themselves
overworked and busy, and I can see why sending a reply to an RSVP is low on the
list of priorities. But it is ironic that our general addiction to social
networking has contributed to people failing to give importance to
relationships in the real world – and that includes displaying enough
politeness to send a quick reply to an invitation to a real world party.
I hope this serves as a warning to
all the non-RSVPers: unless you reply promptly to my next party invitation,
consider yourself banned from future guest lists. You will then have all the
time in the world to interact virtually, but you’ll have little chance in the
real world.
So, how many people in total turned
up to our party? Fortunately, more than 50. Most of them, it seems did want to
live in the real world.
Send a “save the date” message prior
to sending the invitation.
Clearly word your invitation with a
cut-off date for RSVPs.
Make any cut-off date fairly
artificial to allow for people to reply (as many probably will) after the date.
Consider wording it “please reply”
instead of “RSVP” so there’s no ambiguity.
Better still, include a reason why
you need a response. For example: “Please reply by May 26 so I know how much
wine to buy.”
Consider omitting the time of the
party on the invitation so that anyone attending will have to telephone or text
to ask the time.
Include as many reply options as
possible: landline, mobile, email, address …
Add a reply card with postal
invitations or a ready-worded reply email option with emailed ones.
Bear in mind there may be
extenuating circumstances preventing someone from RSVPing promptly so give the
benefit of the doubt and reserve your disdain for those with a clear “can’t be
bothered” history.
No comments:
Post a Comment