The Measles Outbreak Coming Near You
Parents who won’t vaccinate their
children are reviving once-dead diseases. Will a vaccine mandate be needed?
By Haider Javed Warraich in the Wall Street Journal
I was working on the hospital
infectious-disease service when our team was asked to see a young girl with a
mysterious illness that no one had been able to diagnose. She had come to the
emergency room with a fever and runny nose and had a rash spreading across her
body. She had developed a cough so harsh that “whooping cough” had been added
to the long list of possible infirmities. But when the senior doctor on our
team, Frank Berkowitz, an expert in pediatric infections—arrived at her room,
he knew the diagnosis immediately: She had measles.
Many developing countries continue
to suffer from measles, an extremely contagious respiratory disease, but the
U.S. in 2000 was declared “measles free” by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention. The news of a confirmed case set our hospital abuzz, and uniformed
CDC officers soon swooped in.
How did the young girl get the
disease? Her parents had refused to vaccinate her.
Hers is far from the only case.
Measles is making a terrifying comeback in the U.S., with some 600 cases
reported this year, more than in any year in the past two decades. There are
two reasons: the ease of international travel, and an increasing number of
people refusing vaccinations, usually on behalf of their children.
Because parents seeking exemptions
tend to be geographically clustered, these communities can become outbreak
hotbeds. For example, the exemption rate in Orchard Prairie in Washington state
is 24%, five times higher than the state’s median exemption rate and 13 times
higher than the national average.
Forty-eight states offer nonmedical
waivers for parents to exempt their children from vaccination, and the states
where exemptions are the easiest to get are also home to the highest rates of
unvaccinated children. States such as Colorado and Oregon, which only require
parental signatures for exemptions, have exemption rates close to 6%, among the
highest in the country, according to CDC data.
These refusals have directly
resulted in an increase in the incidence of almost forgotten diseases like
whooping cough and measles. After the introduction of the whooping cough
vaccine in the 1940s, cases dwindled to about 1,000 cases annually. Yet the CDC
reported nearly 77,000 cases of whooping cough in 2012 and 2013.
These exemptions raise serious
ethical concerns. Human beings, at the start and end of their lives, are often
unable to make informed decisions. While the elderly designate others as
proxies, children rely on their parents. But when parents don’t allow their
children to get vaccinated, they are willfully putting their child at risk of
catching easily preventable—and sometimes deadly—diseases.
Refusing vaccinations also puts
other children at risk. Vaccines work when given to individuals, but they are
most effective when administered to an entire population. That’s because
vaccines confer “herd immunity” that disrupts the chain of infections, but only
if enough people get the immunization. For a highly infectious disease like
measles, that threshold is about 92% of the population. At less than 92%,
outbreaks can start to pop up, as is happening now.
Some people—such as chemotherapy
patients—cannot be vaccinated. Parents who refuse to vaccinate their children
are conferred protection from other children who get the vaccine and maintain a
prepared herd—but when refusals reach a tipping point, they put everyone at
risk, especially the most vulnerable.
We don’t let people do most things,
such as drunken driving, that endanger themselves or others. So why do we allow
people to prevent their children from receiving the most effective
public-health intervention known to our species?
West Virginia and Mississippi have
the strongest position against vaccine exemptions: Neither allows religious or
personal exemptions, and neither has had an outbreak in more than 20 years.
When I asked Dr. Walter Orenstein,
the former director of the CDC’s National Immunization Program, whether
exemptions should be allowed, he offered caution. “I have some concern about
‘forcing’ vaccinations and not allowing any exemptions,” he said. “It could
backfire and enhance antivaccination sentiment.” Yet with vaccine exemptions
sharply increasing, doctors and public-health experts are running out of
options.
Claims about the dangers of
vaccines—such as their purported relationship with autism—have been rigorously
studied and debunked. Yet anti-vaccine advocates are becoming more vocal. When
scientific proof is overwhelming, and reason fails, they fall back on magical
thinking. Lindey Magee, an antivaccine advocate in Mississippi, told Newsweek
earlier this year, “I saw the Disney movie
‘Bears,’ and if God gave bears instincts to survive their harsh reality, then
human beings certainly have the instincts to protect children.” She added,
“Mumps, measles and rubella do not scare me.”
By wiping out many common and deadly
diseases, and thus the fear they induce, vaccination can be its own worst
enemy. However, we cannot afford to remain reactive. Seminal work in 2012 by
Saad B. Omer, an epidemiologist at Emory University, has demonstrated that
making it more difficult to obtain exemptions—say, by requiring physician
consultation, education or annual renewals—reduces the rate of exemptions. “The
balance of convenience should tip in the favor of vaccinations as opposed to
vaccine exemptions,” he told me.
Physicians are reimbursed for giving
vaccines, but there is no incentive to provide counseling for hesitant parents.
“I strongly support a billing code that would allow time for vaccine
counseling,” Dr. Orenstein added.
The re-emergence of measles may be
the harbinger of other infections such as polio returning from the history
books. While autonomy needs to be a central value driving medical decision-making,
legislators need to protect American children. The young girl at my hospital
with measles survived, but others might not be so lucky.
Dr. Warraich is a physician at the
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston and an instructor at Harvard Medical
School. Dr. Gohar Javed, a research associate at the Aga Khan University in
Karachi, Pakistan, contributed to this op-ed.
No comments:
Post a Comment