The
Left has a nervous breakdown
By Michael Walsh in PJ Media
I realize life is too short to read
everything the Crazy Left disgorges from its white-hot core of resentful
hatred, but Michael Tomasky’s latest rant
at the Daily Beast is just too good to miss, especially if you are a) sane, b)
an American and c) live in the Deep South. Reacting to Mary Landrieu’s crushing
defeat in the Louisiana Senate runoff on Saturday, Tomasky rushed to his computer
and penned this instant classic:
I don’t remember a much sadder sight
in domestic politics in my lifetime than that of Mary Landrieu schlumpfing
around these last few weeks trying to save a Senate seat that was obviously
lost. It was like witnessing the last two weeks of the life of a blind and
toothless dog you knew the vet was just itching to destroy. I know that sounds
mean about her, but I don’t intend it that way. She did what she could and had,
as far as I know, an honorable career. I do, however, intend it to sound mean
about the reactionary, prejudice-infested place she comes from. A toothless dog
is a figure of sympathy. A vet who takes pleasure in gassing it is not.
And that is what Louisiana, and
almost the entire South, has become. The victims of the particular form of
euthanasia it enforces with such glee are tolerance, compassion, civic decency,
trans-racial community, the crucial secular values on which this country was
founded… I could keep this list going. But I think you get the idea. Practically
the whole region has rejected nearly everything that’s good about this country
and has become just one big nuclear waste site of choleric, and extremely
racialized, resentment. A fact made even sadder because on the whole they’re
such nice people! (I truly mean that.)
With Landrieu’s departure, the
Democrats will have no more senators from the Deep South, and I say good.
Forget about it. Forget about the whole fetid place. Write it off. Let the GOP
have it and run it and turn it into Free-Market Jesus Paradise. The Democrats
don’t need it anyway.
And there you have it, the Narrative
in full cry. Southerners — white Southerners — are crazed racists (for voting
against a white candidate), nutcase Christians (for following their faith) and
stump-toothed hillbillies who shop at Wal-Mart (for following their economic
self-interest). In other words, they’re not a bit like Northeastern or West
Coast liberals, and whose idea was it to give them the vote, anyway? Tomasky
concludes his crying jag like this:
It’s lost. It’s gone. A different
country. And maybe someday it really should be. I’ll save that for another
column. Until that day comes, the Democratic Party shouldn’t bother trying. If
they get no votes from the region, they will in turn owe it nothing, and in
time the South, which is the biggest welfare moocher in the world in terms of
the largesse it gets from the more advanced and innovative states, will be on
its own, which is what Southerners always say they want anyway.
It may be worth pointing out to
Tomasky that there is not a single Republican senator from the West Coast at
the moment, and only two from New England. So what? Regional divisions are
nothing new in these United States.
For a rational antidote to this
lunacy, please see Kevin Williamson’s splendid analysis
of the politics (both racial and non-racial) of the once-again Solid South’s
turn from the Democrats to the GOP, which has nothing to do with race and
everything to do with, well, patriotism for the country as founded,
not for the socialist paradise — excuse me, a collective of “advanced and
innovative states” — Leftists wish it to be. A sample:
The Democrats, being intellectually
dishonest, cling to the myth that the two parties “switched places” on racial
issues in the 1960s, that Senator Landrieu’s troubles are a consequence of that
reversal, and that the general Southern realignment is evidence that the
Republican party is a comfortable home for bigots, Confederate revanchists, and
others with dodgy racial politics.
Read the whole thing and compare.
The Left is losing its mind, and it is a wonderful thing to behold.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) says fellow Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer’s (N.Y.) recent comments on ObamaCare are “beyond comprehension.” Schumer caused a stir last month when he said Democrats “blew the opportunity the American people gave them” in 2008 by focusing on healthcare out of the gate instead of on measures to boost the middle class.
In an interview with The Washington Post published Monday, Pelosi noted that Schumer wrote the 1994 assault weapons ban that was blamed for Democratic losses that year. She hit Senate Democrats for distancing themselves from President Obama in the midterm elections, and the party ended up dealing with heavy losses.
“Some senators even walked away from the president. That, I don’t get,” she said.
Gee, that’s too damn bad.
No comments:
Post a Comment