Translate

Saturday, October 04, 2014

Navy Ready for Briefing on Small Surface Combatant, SecDef Not


Navy Ready for Briefing on Small Surface Combatant, SecDef Not

 Marines: Base New Amphib on LPD 17 Design

 
By CHRISTOPHER P. CAVAS in Defense News

 

 WASHINGTON — After months of preparation, the US Navy was set Thursday morning to brief Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel on its recommendations for a new Small Surface Combatant (SSC), and a delegation led by Navy Secretary Ray Mabus waited to make a personal presentation.

“Everything’s ready to go,” one source said of the Navy’s presentation.

But the SecDef never appeared. According to several Pentagon sources, he was delayed by a prior engagement, and the briefing is waiting to be re-scheduled — no easy task, given the hectic schedules of many of the principles.

The results of an SSC Task Force charged with coming up with a more heavily-armed warship to succeed the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) have been one of the more eagerly-awaited secrets in naval circles this year. Those in the know have been exceptionally tight-lipped, and those outside the loop hope that with the Hagel briefing completed — and the recommendations approved — the Navy will be forthcoming about where its small surface warship programs are headed.

Decisions on the SSC need to be made soon — in time, Hagel has directed, “to inform” the 2016 budget, due to be sent to Congress in February.

Meanwhile, a decision on another shipbuilding program could also be close to finalization. The Navy and Marine Corps have promised to decide whether the next amphibious ship design, dubbed LX(R), will be based on existing LPD 17 San Antonio-class ships or developed from other designs. The Navy isn’t planning to award a contract for the ships until 2020, but industry needs to know soon to begin work on competitive designs.

Pentagon sources said Gen. James Amos, Marine Corps commandant, in a recent letter to Mabus, is recommending the new ship be based on the LPD 17 hull form.

To keep the production line hot and costs down, Amos also reportedly recommends buying LPD 28, the yet-to-be-named 12th ship in the San Antonio class, a ship the Navy has not requested but three of four key congressional committees support buying. Congress so far has provided partial funding, but the Navy is declining to order the ship until full funding is available.

Plans call for the Navy to buy 11 LX(R)s, each costing about a third of the price of an LPD 17.

This summer, Sean Stackley, the Navy’s top acquisition official, told Congress the service had completed an LX(R) analysis of alternatives study.

“Affordability will be a key focus for this ship class,” Stackley told the House Seapower subcommittee on July 25. “Industry will be involved in identifying cost drivers and proposing cost reduction initiatives to drive affordability into the design, production, operation, and maintenance of this ship class.”

The choices for the LXR) design, he said, were for a modified LPD 17 derivative, a foreign design, or an entirely new, clean sheet design.

Huntington Ingalls Shipbuilding, builders of San Antonio class, has developed variants of the LPD 17 that it calls Flight II. Those designs strip off significant portions of the LPD 17’s superstructure, replacing many features of the ship with lower-cost alternatives, but keeping the basic hull form and machinery spaces, along with its large flight deck.

 

Posters Comments: 

1)    This article is one example of what happens when a country disarms.

2)    Funding of the war against ISIL is another such example.

3)    Cutting military pay and benefits is another such example.

4)    Extending deployments of remaining forces is another such example.

5)    Cutting the training of the remaining forces, and their Family’s housing maintenance, is another such example. Less plumbers means longer toilet repair times, for example. For those who try repair their own toilets, expect to be prosecuted in many examples.

6)    Recruiting and retention numbers for our present military will probably decline. Only time will tell, and time usually means years to decline, and then years more to recover if we even try to recover an all-volunteer military in sufficient numbers. Plan B is to bring back a military draft, which we left in the early 1970’s.

7)    Plan C is to begin surrendering to smaller, and stronger in their area, regional powers. Surrendering can be actual, or defacto. Suffering the consequences is a given.

8)    America’s military is American men and women, and their Families.

 

No comments: