By Col. Gary Anderson,
USMC (Ret.)
Best Defense guest
columnist
General
Martin Dempsey , the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, knows that the Obama
strategy for dealing with the self-proclaimed Islamic State is doomed to fail
as currently structured; he has done as much to speculate in public that it
will have to be altered. Without American combat troops on the ground to
physically clear the cities and towns that the forces of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
have occupied, we are in for a long and frustrating open-ended conflict that
the American people will quickly tire of. Dempsey is too good a tactician not
to know differently; having served with him briefly on a fact-finding tour for
the deputy secretary of defense in Iraq in 2003, I found him to be one of the
best commanders in the field. If he slaps his four stars on the table and tells
the president to find somebody else to pitch the next inning, it will make a
real difference.
In a telling
study of the Vietnam War, H.R. McMaster, now an Army general officer himself,
castigates the military general-officer class of that era for quietly carrying
out orders that they knew to be wrong. In 2003, many generals strongly
disagreed with President George W. Bush's decision to go to war with Iraq,
but none resigned in protest. How does this happen?
General
officers have offered a number of rationalizations for lack of moral courage
over the years. The most often heard is that they feel they feel compelled to
stay on because only they can do the job and mitigate the worst of the senior
leader's decision. This is tripe; no one is irreplaceable. I would bet that 80
percent of the serving military cannot remember who the last JCS chairman
was.
The reality
is that the very private threat of a resignation might well change a bad
policy. No president in his right mind wants to see the very public resignation
of a top general on principle. If his policy fails, and the Islamic State
strategy surely will, President Obama would alone shoulder the blame for the
debacle. The threat of a resignation itself might cause the
president to reconsider his ill-advised action in taking American troops in a
ground role off the table. Rather than be remembered as the failed implementer
of a strategy that he knew to be fatally flawed, Dempsey would be an example to
generations of future West Point cadets as a soldier who put honor and
professionalism above career concerns.
In my own
small way, I found that the threat of resignation can be a powerful tool over a
decade ago. As a colonel commanding a camp on Okinawa in Japan in 1998, I
became upset with a policy banning Okinawans from using the only recreational
beach in the town neighboring the camp when we were not using it militarily;
the policy was venal, and it came at a time when then Marine Corps was trying
to improve relations with the Okinawans in the wake of a rape the year before I
became commander. I asked for a private meeting with the base commanding
general and handed him a draft e-mail requesting my relief and resignation
explaining the reason; the commandant of the Marine Corps was an information
addressee. I had been recently designated to be the chief of Staff of Marine
Corps experimentation at the commandant's direction, and the general and I both
realized that my quitting over a seemingly trivial matter would reflect badly
on the general himself. He tore up the e-mail and told me that the Okinawans
could use the "damned beach" if it meant so much to me. I realized
that the incident was not a career enhancer, but I slept well that night.
This is not
to say that officers should threaten to resign lightly when they don't get
their way or when their advice is not taken, but honest differences in critical
policy matters that have potentially disastrous strategic consequences as well
as issues of moral conscience should at least make service professionals
consider the option.
Resignation
would have even greater impact if all of the joint chiefs ask for a closed-door
meeting with the president The political and strategic miscalculations that led
up to the rise of the Islamic State came because the president ignored the
advice of his highest national-security advisors. General Dempsey could save
the nation from further strategic folly and perhaps save this president from
himself.
Gary Anderson is a retired Marine
Corps colonel who is an adjunct professor at the George Washington University's
Elliott School of International Affairs.
Note: General Dempsey will draw a military retirement when he retires.
No comments:
Post a Comment