Translate

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Is feminizing a culture good or bad or just a phase?

Much has been said about unleashing one half of humanity to do good. Little is said about the doing bad part. All this is confused by western idealism about equal opportunity, free speech, and other explosive-to-culture anarchist ideas. Some is also confused by man-hating.

Much is published in the west about the socialist ideal of remaking our cultures better. This discussion is led by those who want to remake our cultures in their image. Most know the normal people would never vote for such changes, and politicians and idealists cover up their agendas since they have a long history of being failures in this area. In other words, others before them have tried, and failed. The failures are usually because people did not buy it. The ideas were crummy. There are better ways.

The impossible nut to crack is humanity. Boys and girls are different, thank goodness. Banning boyhood is not an option since no one can legislate humanity, as in hormones and genes. This is not rocket science. Banning girlhood will suffer any similar fate. Why are there enough forceful and naïve fools that even think so and are willing to try trick voters and dominate a culture? Why do we give them access to our children? Some of us won’t, or more simply will teach what parents teach.

What leaders of our culture should promote, and most do, is being in love, being married, and having families, though baby making and national interest was the least thing in my mind at the time. Now the result is a vital national interest. Promoting sexual promiscuity is not a national vital interest, as much fun and pleasure as our kids may derive. The downside is the hormones. The old fashioned idea of good girls and honorable boys needs refurbishment. We all know boys and girls will always connect . What we also need to teach, culturally, is that a girl offering special privileges needs to cross her legs and say no. How about that idea for power?

The American actress Sally Field’s comments about no wars if mothers ran the world got attention in the media. As a father I object to her unelected assumption of pontification. Last I heard, I had kids, too.

Many things in the media reports seem out of control as if we have lost our tolerance for each other politically. I doubt this is correct, since most Americans still go for leadership, thinking, and the good ole golden rule. This especially applies to any who try to change our culture, which is unique in the world, and not too shabby. Best the political feminizing effort goes, it will fail inherently because boys and girls are different, thank goodness.

No comments: