What's 12 x 11? Um,
Let Me Google That
Contrary to today's educational theories,
memorization is critical in the classroom and life.
By David G. Bonagura
Jr.
I'm a bad teacher. Or
so I would be labeled by today's leading education professionals. My crime? Not
my classroom performance and not my students' test scores. The problem is that
I require students to memorize.
My students learn
proper grammar by drilling. They memorize vocabulary by writing given words and
their definitions multiple times for homework, and then sitting the following
day for an oral quiz. They memorize famous quotations by reciting them at the
start of class each day.
For centuries, these
pedagogical techniques were the hallmark of primary and secondary education.
But once John Dewey's educational theories were adopted in public schools
beginning in the 1940s, they fell out of vogue, ridiculed and rejected by
education professionals across the country as detrimental to learning. In
schools of education such techniques are derisively labeled "drill and
kill" and "chalk and talk." Instead, these experts preach
"child-centered" learning activities that make the teacher the
"facilitator" in education, which is understood as a natural process of
self-discovery.
This educational
philosophy has driven every national educational initiative of the last several
decades: New Math, Whole Language, Outcome-based Education and now the Common
Core Standards that are being rolled out across the country.
All of the previous
initiatives have at least three things in common. First, they didn't work. The
U.S. still lags behind the world in education, even though each program, in its
day, was touted as the means to bring our children to the top. Second, they all
espoused the same child-centered educational philosophy, which has coincided
with American students' mediocre performance in the classroom. Third, they
rejected memorization out of hand.
Of course, all good
teachers want their students to acquire not just basic knowledge, but a deeper,
conceptual understanding that is manifested through critical thinking and
analysis—skills that educational fads and initiatives rightly extol. But such
thinking is impossible without first acquiring rock-solid knowledge of the
foundational elements upon which the pyramid of cognition rests.
Memorization is the
most effective means to build that foundation. Yet drilling multiplication
tables, learning to spell, and reciting formulas and rules are almost nowhere
to be found in today's classrooms, tarred as antithetical to true learning and
even harmful for students.
My classroom
experience proves otherwise. Once students have memorized a given set of
vocabulary and grammar rules, they are able to apply their knowledge to more
difficult concepts and activities. Having the fundamentals at the ready gives
them both skill and confidence, two attributes that make learning effective and
enjoyable. If they skipped the memory work on the grounds that the information
can easily be found online, they would drown in a sea of URLs as they struggled
to find the basic information necessary to answer the deeper questions.
Memorization doesn't
need to be as odious as schools of education make it sound. In fact,
memorization exercises in the classroom can be made exciting with a little
ingenuity and humor on the part of the teacher. Elementary school students,
whose minds are particularly fit for memorizing, but not yet ready for critical
thinking, especially excel in these activities.
Even so, students are
not likely to love doing homework or studying for tests. It's a safe bet they
also don't like eating vegetables or going to bed early. But these are all
necessary habits for good health.
In our technologically
sophisticated culture, some people have concluded that memorization is no
longer necessary since all the information we need is available at the push of
a button or tap of a screen. But I shudder at what might have happened to the
Apollo 13 flight crew if its NASA team had to spend precious minutes looking up
multiplication tables, or what will happen if our government's
national-security advisers needed to consult Wikipedia to shape their foreign
policy decisions. If teachers compel their students to memorize basic facts
about math, science, grammar, literature and history, then these students will
be far more adept at responding to challenges when they become leaders.
Before we implement
the same faulty educational philosophy disguised in the new dressings of the
Common Core, memorization deserves to be reinstated to its foundational role in
learning. Only then will American students have a core of knowledge that they
can think critically about.
Mr. Bonagura is a teacher and writer in New York.
No comments:
Post a Comment