Christie, Hillary and Obama
The first time
I saw New Jersey Governor Chris Christie on television, a few years ago, my
first reaction was astonishment: "A talking Republican!"
It would
scarcely have been more astonishing if there had been a talking giraffe. For
reasons unknown, most Republican leaders seem to pay very little attention to
articulation -- certainly as compared to leading Democrats, who seem to pay
little attention to anything else.
Governor
Christie's nearly two-hour-long press conference last week showed again that he
is in a class by himself when it comes to Republicans who can express
themselves in the heat of political battle.
When it comes
to policies, I might prefer some other Republican as a 2016 presidential
candidate. But the bottom line in politics is that you have to get elected, in
order to have the power to accomplish anything. It doesn't matter how good your
ideas are, if you can't be bothered to articulate them in a way that the voting
public can understand.
Chris
Christie's press conference showed that, unlike Barack Obama, Christie did not
duck the media or sidestep questions. Nor did he resort to euphemisms or cry
out, like Hillary Clinton, "What difference, at this point, does it
make?"
He met the
questions head on and gave unequivocal answers -- the kind of answers that
could, and should, destroy his political future if they are not true.
More important,
Governor Christie quickly fired the people he held responsible for deliberately
creating a traffic jam on the George Washington Bridge. Contrast that with the
many scandals in Washington for which President Obama has not fired anyone.
While the
creation of a traffic jam in a small New Jersey town shows the calloused
ugliness too often found among political operators puffed up with their own
power, this cannot compare with the threat to freedom when the Internal Revenue
Service targets the administration's political opponents during an election year.
Nor can a
traffic jam compare with the Department of Justice's gun-running operation that
led to the death of an American Border Patrol agent in the southwest or the
State Department's actions and inactions that led to the deaths of four
American officials killed by terrorists in Benghazi.
Nevertheless,
media coverage of the traffic jam in New Jersey was several times as extensive
as any -- or all -- of these far more consequential scandals in Washington.
Moreover, many of these media reactions simply assumed that Governor Christie
must have known about the traffic jam on the George Washington Bridge.
Does anyone who
thinks that a traffic jam at the George Washington Bridge should attract a
governor's attention have any idea how many traffic jams there are on the
various highways leading into Manhattan?
The Long Island
Expressway, for example, long ago acquired the title, "the world's longest
parking lot." Traffic backed up heading into, or out of, the Holland
Tunnel or the Lincoln Tunnel is nothing new. My recollections of driving on
highways in and around Manhattan include very few memories of free-flowing
traffic.
Any governor
who devoted his time to looking into traffic jams between New Jersey and New
York would have very little time left for doing anything else.
If anything
good comes out of this shabby episode of political vindictiveness by Governor
Christie's staffers, it showed what a skewed sense of perspective most of the
media have on what kinds of issues are important. It is not that the media
consider traffic jams more important than human lives. But the fact that
Christie is the current frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination
in 2016 -- and is ahead of Hillary Clinton in the polls -- makes him a target
for a partisan media.
Given that
blatant partisanship, the need for a Republican candidate in 2016 who can make
his case to the public, in spite of the media, is especially acute -- even
though it is much too early to try to predict who that candidate will be.
Whatever the
political fate of Governor Christie, he has provided an example of the kind of
articulation that is needed -- indeed, imperative -- if the Republicans are to
have any chance of rescuing this country from the ruinous policies of the past
few years.
No comments:
Post a Comment