There won’t be a test
The military
budget process I knew in my time inside the DC Beltway was:
1) Compete for funding within the Marine
Corps.
2) Compete for funding within the
Department of the Navy.
a. There are two naval services which
are: The Navy and The Marines. That often confuses and complicates things, too.
b. Naval aviation includes the Navy and
the Marines. The ratio is around 2 to 1, that is for every two Navy planes
there is one Marine plane. The building, care and maintenance of all this
aviation stuff costs money, too.
c. At the college level, one may see
Naval ROTC on a building, vice Navy ROTC on the same building. I suspect many
called it the Navy ROTC, but that is not how it really works.
d. Sometimes the Navy and the Marines
come to “loggerheads”, so to assume the Navy gets “two votes” is not an
accurate statement. Both services will often abuse that when required.
3) Compete for funding within the
Department of Defense. Said another way, compete for funds with the other
military services, like the Army and the Air Force.
4) Compete for funding within the
Congress, which in the end authorizes and appropriates funding.
Now one
could try do end runs, and I was also not above that. But so can anybody else,
too.
And at any point
in the process, the idea and funding I was promoting might get beat out in the
end. It is probably fair to say most American military people have good
objectives, in the end.
And then
there is the American media, which can influence the action, too. And they
often do, too, or at least try to. If that sounds like propaganda, it is kind
of like that, but still different, too.
And last,
there is competition within companies who often receive the funds to do their
bit. Never discount that, either.
And I never
discounted the influence of our House and Senate staffers, either. They most
decidedly are part of the process, too.
No comments:
Post a Comment