Obama's Glozell Diplomacy
By Clarice Feldman in American Thinker
This week the bizarre priorities and
policies of the President presented themselves in relief so stark even the
members of those upscale synagogues headed by J Street rabbis -- the guys who
say “never again” and then support the very Administration that is making
“again” more likely -- must be starting to catch on.
In a speech full of platitudes and
signifying nothing much at all besides his 1960’s style fantasies of history
and human behavior, Obama made his Middle East peroration in Cairo in June
2004. Just as he preposterously promised us that upon his election
the oceans would begin to recede, there he sketched a rosy picture of peace and
tranquility in the Middle East. At the same time, in defiance of
the Egyptian authorities which had declared the Moslem Brotherhood an illegal
organization, he insisted 10 members of the opposition party, the Moslem
Brotherhood, be invited to hear his oration.
Ironically, what happened next
showed that the only way to bring peace in the Middle East was to ignore Obama
completely. True his tacit support of the Moslem Brotherhood helped
them unseat Hosni Mubarak and install Mohamed Morsi in his place, but Morsi so
overplayed his hand that he was soon deposed and the “Moslem coup” died
aborning. His successor, Abdelfattah el-Sisi has been a forthright
supporter of reform in Islam, has cut off supplies to Palestinian terrorists,
even bulldozing the area near their border to make cross border smuggling of
arms, terrorists and supplies more difficult. By all accounts Egypt
and Israel are on better terms than they were in 2009, but only by not making
concessions to Palestine, as Obama would have them do, and by not turning over
control of Egypt to Obama’s friends in the Moslem Brotherhood.
To date, Obama’s upending of long
established alliances around the world has done the most harm in the Middle
East where the Iranian government directly or through subsidiary outfits is
gobbling up more territory, as we pretend the stalled nuclear negotiations are
going to do anything to halt Iran’s nuclear program. This week we
released billions of dollars of their frozen assets, refused to go along with
harsher sanctions for their open violations of existing agreements, and stood
by as their proxy Houthis in Yemen overthrew that government, posing an even
greater challenge to the Saudis and to our drone warfare program based in
Yemen. Once again, Obama’s proven himself a false prophet, for just last
September he hailed that country as “a success story”. Best
describing the situation there was Tom Maguire:
“The enemy of my enemy is my
other enemy”
Further unsettling the area was the
death this week of Saudi King Abdullah.
Abdullah reportedly could not stand
Obama. The President was going to send Joe Biden to pay the
nation’s respects but now claims the White House staff just happened to notice
that he’d be leaving India in time to do this himself. The Saudi
succession is unclear, the area is increasingly unstable and Iran’s threat to
the Kingdom grows by the moment fed by Obama’s feckless policies.
One wonders how delighted they will be to see him.
But that’s just background to the
week’s events which saw our thin-skinned puerile president fighting a childish
war with Congress and Israel, in a fight his party which depends so heavily on
Jewish support and contributions was hoping would stay hidden behind the major
media screen. (The deflated balls the media paid most attention to
this week were on the football field, not in Washington.) They hope
Jewish voters still don’t understand the virtually unanimous support of the
Republican Congress for Israel and the Democrats’ leftward swing toward her
enemies. (Robert Menendez, co-sponsor of the bill to toughen sanctions
is a welcome exception to the Democrats on this issue. The day
after Obama’s State of the Union address, he said the Administration’s talking
points seemed to have been crafted in Tehran.) Don’t hold your breath
waiting to hear from Senators Schumer or Boxer on this development.
Speaker Boehner fired the long
overdue volley, inviting President Netanyahu to address both Houses of Congress
about the threat from radical Islam and Iran. This is an unusual move to
be sure and Peggy Noonan and others gasped at the audacity. Still,
what’s more audacious than cozying up to America and Israel’s enemy, Iran,
while garnering up Jewish campaign funds and support with lies about your
intentions? And what else is left besides Congress and a supine press to
fight the President’s sellout of the Middle East to America’s enemies?
The White House has been dealing
with Iran in secret without informing Israel.
Despite ostensible full coordination
between the US and Israel over strategies for thwarting Iran’s nuclear weapons
drive, the administration did not keep Israel fully informed on those
talks, Channel 10 news reported, but Jerusalem nonetheless has a pretty
clear picture of what has been going on in the secret channel.
White House spokesman Bernadette
Meehan was quoted by Haaretz as saying that the report was “absolutely, 100
percent false.”
The report, which relied on unnamed
senior Israeli officials, said the US team to the secret talks was led by
Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett. Her primary interlocutor, the report
said, was the head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, Ali Akbar
Salehi. The talks have been taking place in various Gulf states.
In the course of the talks, the report
said, the Americans offered the Iranians a series of “confidence-building
measures,” which underlined American readiness to conclude a deal and undercut
sanctions pressure
The White House response reflects
Obama’s usual petulance and lies. First they said it was a breach
of protocol to have invited Netanyahu without first consulting with the white
House. Undoubtedly this is so, but this is not a normal Administration or
situation. In any event, Obama is in no position to stand on protocol.
Among his notable departures from protocol: bowing to the Saudi and Japanese
monarchs, gifting the Queen of England an iPod of his speeches; giving a
toast while the orchestra played “God Save the Queen” in Britain, making the
Dalai Lama leave the White House through the back entrance past the trash
containers; leaving Netanyahu sitting downstairs while he went upstairs to
dinner. Surely there are more such instances, which I’ve forgotten,
but these breaches stand out.
Another assertion was that Obama
would not meet with Netanyahu when he comes because he doesn’t want to affect
the upcoming Israeli election. As far as I can tell, Israeli voters
hold Obama in such low regard the only way he could affect the election would
be to hug and kiss Netanyahu when he’s here.
The dirty fighting continued with
the White House indicating it was inappropriate for foreign leaders to lobby
Congress, apparently hoping we’d forget that just days before they had invited
British Prime Minister Cameron to do that very thing to scotch
Congressional efforts to force tougher sanctions on Iran.
The capper was the White House leak
that Israel’s intelligence agency Mossad itself wanted us to continue Obama’s
all carrots no stick policy toward Iran. When you tell a whopper
that enormous expect to be caught out even with our deadbeat press.
We now have an alternative media that remains awake.
[quote]
On January 21, 2015, Josh Rogin and
Eli Lake at Bloomberg News reported Israeli Mossad Goes Rogue, Warns U.S. on Iran
Sanctions:
The Israeli intelligence agency
Mossad has broken ranks with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, telling
U.S. officials and lawmakers that a new Iran sanctions bill in the
U.S. Congress would tank the Iran nuclear negotiations.[snip]
In a rare move, the head of Mossad
issued a statement denying the reports that he is against sanctions.
Israel Matzav has the details and
translation:
The above was just posted on TwitLonger
by Israel Radio reporter Chico Menashe. Here’s my translation:
Reaction of the Mossad Chairman to
the new crisis with Washington:
On 19 January 2015, Mossad Chairman
Tamir Pardo met with a delegation of American Senators. The meeting
took place at the Senators’ request, and with the Prime Minister’s approval.
Contrary to the report, the Mossad
Chairman did not say that he opposes additional sanctions against
Iran. In the meeting, the Mossad Chairman emphasized the unusual
effectiveness of the sanctions imposed on Iran a number of years ago in
bringing Iran to the negotiating table.
The Mossad Chairman pointed out that
the negotiations with Iran must be conducted using ‘carrots and sticks,’ and
the ‘sticks’ are currently missing. The Mossad Chairman pointed out
that without strong pressure, it will not be possible to bring about
significant compromises on the Iranian side.
The Mossad Chairman did not relate
to the use of the term ‘hand grenade’ with respect to the imposition of
sanctions, because in his eyes, these are the ‘sticks’ that will help to obtain
a good agreement. He used this term to describe the possibility of
creating a temporary breakdown in the talks, at the end of which the
negotiations will be restarted under better conditions.
The Mossad Chairman explicitly
pointed out that the agreement that is being reached with Iran is bad, and may
lead to a regional arms race.
Jennifer Rubin sums up the situation:
All of this suggests a quiet
diplomatic war behind the scenes. The administration, contrary to
the wishes of Israel and Middle East allies, refuses to put more pressure on
Iran. Our allies and many observers in the U.S. as well as a bipartisan
majority of lawmakers fear the president is giving away the store and that Iran
is gaining a nuclear weapons capability, all with the blessing of the
West. This is “containment” by another name. [snip] What is certain
is that the administration wants a deal so badly it wants no interference from
anyone. Congress, the large majority of Americans, Israel (our
closest ally in the Middle East) and the Sunni states understand that there
will be no deal, only capitulation, unless pressure is increased on
Iran. This is arguably the most serious break in U.S.-Israeli
relations ever, a break that stems from a president who has the worst
relationship with Israel since its founding. That it spilled over
into the public tug and pull is a message of how badly relations have
ruptured. Congress needs to act promptly to maintain solidarity
with our allies and to stave off a catastrophically dangerous deal.
UPDATE: It is now being reported that the president will not meet with
Netanyahu when he visits in March. This obvious snub typifies
Obama’s attitude toward our closest ally. They are certainly
pleased in Tehran.
But none of this seems to have kept
Obama from his most important responsibilities.This week he found time to sit
down for interviews with three wacky women, including a green lipsticked
GloZell who posts online videos of her eating Froot Loops from her bathtub
andis known for a comedy video where she says she loves Obama because:
“He black! He black he black he
black! Yes, I said it.”
His priorities, public relations
stunts and foreign policies are stupid! They’re stupid stupid! Yes, I said it.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/01/obamas_glozell_diplomacy.html#ixzz3PorKtrSq
No comments:
Post a Comment