A Simple Question
It is amazing how a simple question
can cause a complex lie to collapse like a house of cards. The simple question
was asked by Bill O'Reilly of the Fox News Channel, and it was addressed to two
Democrats. He asked what has Hillary Clinton ever accomplished.
The two Democrats immediately
sidestepped the question and started reciting their talking points in favor of
Hillary. But O'Reilly kept coming back to the fact that nothing they were
talking about was an accomplishment.
For someone who has spent her entire
adult life in politics, including being a Senator and then a Secretary of
State, Hillary Clinton has nothing to show for all those years -- no
significant legislation of hers that she got passed in the Senate, and only an
unbroken series of international setbacks for the United States during her time
as Secretary of State.
Before Barack Obama entered the
White House and appointed Mrs. Clinton Secretary of State, Al Qaeda operatives
in Iraq had notified their higher ups, stationed in Pakistan, that their cause
was lost in Iraq and that there was no point sending more men there.
Hosni Mubarak was in charge in
Egypt. He posed no threat to American or Western interests in the Middle East
or to Christians within Egypt or to Israel. But the Obama administration threw
its weight behind the Muslim Brotherhood, which took over and began terrorizing
Christians in Egypt and promoting hostility to Israel.
In Libya next door, the Qaddafi
regime had already given up its weapons of mass destruction, after they saw
what happened to Saddam Hussein in Iraq. But President Obama's foreign policy,
carried out by Secretary of State Clinton, got Qaddafi removed, after which
Libya became a terrorist haven where an American ambassador was killed, for the
first time in decades.
The rationale for getting rid of
Middle East leaders who posed no threat to American interests was that they
were undemocratic and their people were restless. But there are no democracies
in the Middle East, except for Israel. Moreover, the people were restless in
Iran and Syria, and the Obama-Clinton foreign policy did nothing to support
those who were trying to overthrow these regimes.
It would be only fair to balance
this picture with foreign policy triumphs of the Obama-Clinton team. But there
are none. Not in the Middle East, not in Europe, where the Russians have
invaded the Crimea, and not in Asia, where both China and North Korea are
building up threatening military forces, while the Obama administration has
been cutting back on American military forces.
Hillary Clinton became an iconic
figure by feeding the media and the left the kind of rhetoric they love. Barack
Obama did the same and became president. Neither had any concrete
accomplishments besides rhetoric beforehand, and both have had the opposite of
accomplishments after taking office.
They have something else in common.
They attract the votes of those people who vote for demographic symbolism --
"the first black president" to be followed by "the first woman
president" -- and neither to be criticized, lest you be denounced for
racism or sexism.
It is staggering that there are sane
adults who can vote for someone to be President of the United States as if they
are in school, just voting for "most popular boy" or "most
popular girl" -- or, worse yet, voting for someone who will give them free
stuff.
Whoever holds that office makes
decisions involving the life and death of Americans and -- especially if Iran
gets a nuclear arsenal -- the life and death of this nation. It took just two
nuclear bombs -- neither of them as powerful as those available today -- to get
a very tough nation like Japan to surrender.
Anyone familiar with World War II
battles in the Pacific knows that it was not unusual for 90 percent of the
Japanese troops defending Iwo Jima or other islands to fight to the death, even
after it was clear that American troops had them beaten.
When people like that surrender
after two nuclear bombs, do not imagine that today's soft Americans -- led by
the likes of Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton -- will fight on after New York
and Chicago have been reduced to radioactive ashes.
Meanwhile, ISIS and other terrorists
are giving us a free demonstration of what surrender would mean. But perhaps we
can kick the can down the road, and leave that as a legacy to our children and
grandchildren, along with the national debt.
No comments:
Post a Comment