What Are the Best Hospitals? Rankings Disagree
Four services that rate U.S.
facilities show wide discrepancies, study says; 27 hospitals rated among best
in one list rank among worst in another
By Melinda Beck in the Wall Street Journal
What makes a top hospital? Four
services that publish hospital ratings for consumers strongly disagree,
according to a study in the journal
Health Affairs.
No single hospital received high
marks from all four services—U.S. News & World Report, Consumer Reports,
the Leapfrog Group and Healthgrades—and only 10% of the 844 hospitals that were
rated highly by one service received top marks from another, the study published
Monday found.
The measures were so divergent that
27 hospitals were simultaneously rated among the nation’s best by one service
and among the worst by another.
Demand for such data is surging, the
authors wrote, as consumers increasingly comparison shop for medical services
and efforts accelerate to tie payment to the quality of care. But they warned
that widely varying definitions of quality could create more confusion than
clarity—and make it difficult for hospitals to know where to focus
improvements.
“You can go into most towns in America and the
local hospital is on somebody’s list of top somethings,” the study’s senior
author, Peter Pronovost, said in an interview. “The public deserves much more
transparency about what these quality measures mean so it isn’t just a beauty
pageant,” added Dr. Pronovost, director of the Armstrong Institute for Patient
Safety and Quality at Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore.
The study didn’t name individual
hospitals, but UCLA’s Ronald Reagan Medical Center in Los Angeles was among
U.S. News’ top 18 hospitals in the nation in 2013, while receiving a “D” safety
rating from Leapfrog the same year. Robert Cherry, chief medical and quality
officer for the UCLA Health System, said in an email: “Unfortunately, we can
attest as an institution that has come out on both sides of these ‘report
cards’ that there is a lack of clarity, consistency and understanding between
the various methodologies and in some cases [this] may be misleading the
public.”
All four services use different
rating methodologies, eligibility criteria and data sources and describe their
results differently.
Consumer Reports
calculates a safety score for hospitals
from 0 to 100, based on rates of infection, readmissions and other measures.
Leapfrog’s Hospital Safety Score assigns hospitals letter grades from A to F, reflecting how
well they keep patients from “preventable harm and medical errors.”
Healthgrades calculates an annual list of the country’s 50 and 100 best hospitals, based on
mortality and complication rates for a variety of conditions. U.S. News focuses
on care for serious conditions and scores hospitals from 1 to 100 in 16
specialties, as well as ranking them nationally and regionally.
To compare them, the study authors
defined “high performing” as a score of 65 or higher from Consumer Reports; an
A from Leapfrog; being listed in Healthgrades’ top 100 and being included in
the U.S. News Honor Roll of hospitals with high scores in at least six specialties.
Low performers were those with a score
of 30 or lower from Consumer Reports, a D or F from Leapfrog or a score of 10
or lower in at least one specialty from U.S. News. Healthgrades doesn’t list
low-performing hospitals.
Officials from each of the services
defended their approach and said they publish more detailed information on
their websites.
Doris Peter, director of the
Consumer Reports health-ratings center, said the divergent findings are “not a
surprise to us—we’re rating different aspects of hospital quality. And we are
all hampered by needing better data.”
Evan Marks, chief strategy officer
of Healthgrades, said that by comparing such different services, the study
authors “chose to muddy the water and make it more confusing.”
“There is no one-size-fits-all
answer to which hospital is best,” said Ben Harder, chief of health analysis
for U.S. News. “We are the only rating that looks at high complexity care.”
“I think there is room for many
voices,” said Leah Binder, president and CEO of Leapfrog. “Our market research
does not find that consumers are confused. On the contrary, most think there
isn’t enough information available and they’d like more.”
No comments:
Post a Comment