A pattern of behavior
All
the below made me think. Make up your
own mind! Now, for me, I don't believe more than 50% of what I read, but the
percentage does go up if I read it twice from two independent sources. The
trouble these days is that so many articles reference each other, kind of like
a circular problem for the geeks in the crowd. Whatever, we citizens are
subject to some pretty good propaganda these days.
Do
Obama's Executive Orders Reveal A Pattern?
President Barack Hussein
"kill list" Obama has offered over 135 Executive Orders (EO), and he
is not even through his first term. He is creating a wonderland of government
controls covering everything imaginable, including a list of "Emergency
Powers" and martial law EOs. And while Obama is busy issuing EOs to
control everything inside the US, he has been issuing EOs to force us to submit
to international regulations instead of our US Constitution.
And comments by North
Carolina governor Beverly Perdue and former OMB director Peter Orszag only
contribute to this pattern.
Is it now time to start
connecting the dots? Obama signed EO 13603
on March 22, 2012. Then he signed EO 13617
on June 25, 2012, declaring a national emergency. Then he signed EO 13618
on July 6, 2012.
In EO 13603, entitled,
"National Defense Resources Preparedness," Obama says (among other
things) that [we must]:
be prepared, in the
event of a potential threat to the security of the United States, to take
actions necessary to ensure the availability of adequate resources and
production capability, including services and critical technology, for national
defense requirements;
Obama has the power,
through this EO, to "nationalize" (not seize) private assets in order
to protect national interests. Further, the EO effectively states that he can:
1. "identify"
requirements for emergencies
2. "assess"
the capability of the country's industrial and technological base
3. "be
prepared" to ensure the availability of critical resources in time of
national threat
4. "improve the
efficiency" of the industrial base to support national defense
5. "foster
cooperation" between commercial and defense sectors
There are pundits that
suggest that by signing EO 13603, Obama has given himself power to declare martial law and suspend elections.
The main problem with EO
13603 is that the words/phrases in quotes can be interpreted in many ways,
including ways that favor Obama and Democrats. Wait, we can have our Supreme
Court decide what they mean. But that won't work since we know four of them to
be Democrat hacks, and one justice can be influenced by the MSM.
In EO 13617, entitled
"Blocking Property of the Government of the Russian Federation Relating to
the Disposition of Highly Enriched Uranium Extracted From Nuclear
Weapons," Obama says (among other things)that"
the risk of nuclear
proliferation created by the accumulation of a large volume of weapons-usable
fissile material in the territory of the Russian Federation continues to
constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and
foreign policy of the United States, and hereby declare a national emergency to
deal with that threat.
Obama, by signing this
EO, actually declared a national emergency. I guess that President Theodore
Roosevelt's famous saying, "Speak softly and carry a big stick,"
can't apply in this case because we don't want to offend the Russians by having
them honor treaties they signed (the "HEU" Agreement). But what's
more important is that Obama can now "justify" any action he wants to
take by citing EO 13617 since it declares a national emergency.
Then, in EO 13618,
entitled, "Assignment of National Security and Emergency Preparedness
Communications Functions," Obama states (among other things) that:
The Federal Government must
have the ability to communicate at all times and under all circumstances to
carry out its most critical and time sensitive missions. ... Such
communications must be possible under all circumstances to ensure national
security, effectively manage emergencies, and improve national resilience.
Obama cites
"national security" in this EO. I guess Obama sees ANY excuse for
declaring a national security emergency will appear better than taking over the
nation's communications assets by force
Want more examples of
what Obama is doing?
- EO
10990 allows the Government to take over all modes of transportation and
control of highways and seaports.
- EO
10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas,
petroleum, fuels, and minerals.
- EO
11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under
government supervision
- EO
11002 designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration
of all persons.
- EO
11003 allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft,
including commercial aircraft.
- EO
11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate and establish
new locations for populations.
- EO
11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways, and
public storage facilities.
Are we beginning to see
a pattern here? We're being prepared for a national emergency. Then there's
taking control. I personally think that what Obama is doing goes way beyond
being prepared.
North Carolina governor
Beverly Perdue (Democrat), on September 28, 2011, suggested that perhaps
elections should be suspended for two years by canceling, until the economy recovers, the 2012
elections. After that remark got the reception it deserved, Pardue's staff
tried to pass it off as a joke.
Former White House
director of the Office of Management and Budget Peter Orszag, who, on September
14, 2011, in a The New Republic article entitled "Too Much of a Good Thing: Why we need less
democracy," said that we are that we are hampered by too much democracy,
that the constitutional system (not really a democracy) is too slow to react,
and the deliberations and negotiations are simply too cumbersome. Orszag
suggests that the constitutional rules of limiting government offers
impediments to autocratic, dictatorial actions, and are just too great.
That North Carolina
governor Perdue would even joke (if it was a joke) about canceling an election
is frightening enough, but that Orszag, a former official in Obama's
administration, believes that doing away with the US Constitution is a viable
solution should cause every AT reader to quake.
I'm never comfortable
with laws that give the government broad reaching powers in the event of a
"national emergency," especially when there is no clear, set,
unchangeable definition of what actually constitutes a "national
emergency."
Circumvention of the US
Constitution by any means possible is the ultimate goal of Democrats and the
Obama administration because the 2012 election is shaping up to be a repeat of
the 2010 election.
I am not a conspiracy
theorist, but these three latest EOs and previous EOs Obama signed, coupled
with Perdue's and Orszag's comments, suggest that something besides coincidence
is going on.
Dr. Beatty earned a
Ph.D. in quantitative management and statistics from Florida State University.
He was a (very conservative) professor of quantitative management specializing
in using statistics to assist/support decision making. He has been a consultant
to many small businesses and is now retired. Dr. Beatty is a veteran who served
in the U.S. Army for 22 years. He blogs at: rwno.limewebs.com.
Will Obama Keep Power 'by Any Means
Necessary'?
Let's go there: if Obama
thinks he's losing, will he allow safe and fair elections on November 6? And if
he does lose, will he peacefully turn over power to Mitt Romney on January 20,
2013? Or will he cling to power "by any means necessary," as a highly
placed insider alleges?
Now, I'm truly sorry to
raise such disgusting, un-American, crazy-sounding questions, but, alas,
they're not crazy, and I've got a disquieting amount of evidence. The Democrats
have already accused Romney of murdering a woman with cancer, financial
felonies, and not filing taxes for ten years -- the last charge delivered by
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on the Senate floor, on the basis of
absolutely no evidence whatsoever.
By Democrat standards,
I've got enough proof to put away Obama, et al. for life without parole.
Whatever chicanery Obama
and his investors may be contemplating, it will probably unfold against some
gargantuan crisis, manufactured or otherwise. So cast your mind back to
September 11, 2001, the day of the New York mayoral primary.
In the chaos after the
attacks, Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, who was term-limited from running, pleaded
that his leadership was essential and that he should be granted an extra three
months in office after his term ran out on January 1. Giuliani's unprecedented
power-grab was rightfully scorned by his eventual successor, Michael Bloomberg.
So what did Bloomberg do when he ran into term limits? He deployed his
multi-billion-dollar fortune to manipulate the law and buy himself a
quasi-legal third term, claiming that only he had the expertise to handle the
2008 financial crisis.
My point? Politicians a
great deal more conventional than Obama have loathed giving up power, and they
have used crises and unethical machinations to try to keep it.
Now, let's look at just
some of the disturbing evidence that indicates that Obama and his investors are
plotting something big:
Super-High-Level Trial Balloons
USA Today
reported that on September 27, 2011, Governor Beverly Perdue, Democrat of
North Carolina, told a Rotary Club audience, "I think we ought to
suspend, perhaps, elections for Congress for two years and just tell them we won't hold it against
them, whatever decisions they make, to just let them help this country
recover[.] ... You want people who don't worry about the next election." When outrage greeted her suggestion, she
retreated to the standard defense: she was just joking. What a kidder!
Meanwhile, that same
month, Peter Orszag, Obama's former director of the Office of Management and
Budget, published an article in The New Republic titled "Too Much of A Good Thing: Why We Need Less
Democracy." In it, he posited that the country was too polarized; hence,
"radical as it sounds, we need to counter the gridlock of our political
institutions by making them a bit less democratic."
Please note that these
suggestions to suspend elections and radically reduce democratic control did
not come from basement-dwelling bloggers. They came from the governor of the
very state in which the Democrats are holding their national convention and
from one of Obama's most prominent Cabinet members. Their close timing suggests
that these ideas were circulating at the highest levels of the Democrat power
elite.
"Whom Does the Government Intend to Shoot?"
That's the question
recently posed by retired Major General Jerry Curry in the Daily Caller, in light of horrifying reports that the Social Security
Administration is buying 174,000 rounds of hollow-point bullets for
distribution to 41 locations in the U.S.
According to Major
General Curry, Social Security's ammo spree follows the purchase by the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of 46,000 rounds of
hollow-point ammunition. Will they be shooting fish in a barrel?
Most terrifying of all,
Major General Curry reports that the Department of Homeland Security ordered
750 million rounds of hollow-point ammunition in March, then subsequently
ordered an additional 750 million rounds, including bullets capable of
penetrating walls.
"This is enough ammunition
to empty five rounds into the body of every living American citizen,"
writes Major General Curry, who wonders what plan might require "so many
dead Americans."
I strongly suggest that
you read Major General Curry's article for yourself, so you can appreciate the full horror of what he
describes. After pointing out that Congress has done nothing to investigate
these weapon purchases, Major General Curry, a 40-year veteran, concludes with
these chilling words:
This is a deadly serious
business. I hope I'm wrong, but something smells rotten. And If the Congress
isn't going to do its duty and investigate this matter fully, the military will
have to protect the Constitution, the nation, and our citizens.
Executive Orders
Obama may not be fond of
governing, but he certainly does enjoy issuing executive orders -- 135 so far.
As American Thinker's Warren Beatty points out, these little-reported edicts reveal an
all-too-predictable pattern: concentrating all national power and resources in
Obama's hands, in case of "emergency."
So far, Obama has
granted himself the right to control all transportation, including highways, airports, seaports, and railroads, and all
modes of communication, storage facilities, electrical power, gas, petroleum,
fuels, and minerals.
Should you resist any of
these emergency measures, rest assured that the U.S. government is now well
supplied with bullets.
Openly War-Gaming against American Citizens
A recent issue of the
well-respected Small Wars Journal featured an article titled "Full
Spectrum Operations in the Homeland: A 'Vision' of the Future." Written by
retired Army Col. Kevin Benson of the Army's University of Foreign Military and
Jennifer Weber, a Civil War expert, the article helpfully game-played, in full
operational detail, how the Army would destroy a local Tea Party insurrection.
The authors claim that
should Tea Party rebels take over a City Hall, "Americans will expect the
military to execute without pause and as professionally as if it were acting
overseas"; therefore, "the Army cannot disappoint the American
people, especially in such a moment."
The brazenness of this
scheme for the U.S. military to kill Americans created a small, temporary stir.
The Washington Times editorialized, "This is a dark, pessimistic and wrongheaded view of what
military leaders should spend their time studying." The Washington Times also noted:
A professor at the Joint
Forces Staff College was relieved of duty in June for uttering the heresy that
the United States is at war with Islam. The Obama administration contended the
professor had to be relieved because what he was teaching was not U.S. policy.
Because there is no disclaimer attached to the Small Wars piece, it is fair to
ask, at least in Col. Benson's case, whether his views reflect official policy
regarding the use of U.S. military force against American citizens.
Active Partnership with America's Foreign Enemies
Many spectacles have
enlivened presidential elections over the years, but 2012 marks the first time
that high-level military personnel have felt compelled to publicly tell the
president to stop leaking national security secrets.
A group of former U.S.
intelligence and Special Forces operatives created a 22-minute video, "Dishonorable Disclosures," to shame
Obama into shutting up about priceless intelligence related to bin Laden's death, British-Saudi penetration of
al-Qaeda, and the Israeli-American Stuxnet virus attack on Iran's nuclear
program.
Normally, presidents
don't want to endanger American citizens and military personnel by leaking
top-secret information -- but aiding and abetting the enemy is apparently all
in a day's work for Obama.
And so, if he wants to
stir up trouble before the election, either at home or abroad, he'll have
plenty of enemy partners to help. First, he's got the Russians, to whose
president he was caught whispering on a hot mic about missile defense,
"This is my last election[.] ... After my election, I have more
flexibility."
Second, Obama is this close to the Muslim Brotherhood, who are world-class experts on unleashing political violence.
Obama helped the Muslim Brotherhood ascend to power in Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco,
and Libya, and he's placed its operatives in the highest levels of the American
government. Surely, such clever characters as Huma Abedin, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's deputy chief of staff, and Mohamed Elibiary, a Homeland Security Advisory committee member, can be trusted to
think up some exciting turmoil to apply where needed.
And finally, close to
home, Obama can rely on the Sinaloa drug cartel in Mexico, whom he supplied with thousands of guns. Gratefully,
they used their American taxpayer-funded AK-47s to wipe out rival drug gangs
and to murder Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. Attorney General Eric Holder is
presently in contempt of Congress for refusing to turn over documents on Operation Fast and Furious, and Obama ("President Transparency")
has claimed executive privilege to withhold them.
Sending hordes of
expensively armed drug gang members across our border should be a snap, now
that Obama has crippled our Border Patrol. Just think of all the headline-grabbing
distractions these energetic young men can unleash!
Active Partnership with Domestic Criminal Groups
When Louis Farrakhan met
Ahmadinejad: now there's a romance made in the bowels of hell. Toss in the head
of the New Black Panthers and fifty radical imams, and you've got the
"Beast Axis" that was forged in a Manhattan hotel on September 27,
2010, according to The Blaze.
New Black Panther
Chairman Malik Zulu Shabazz boasted on Black Panther Radio that he "stands on solid ideological
ground" with "His Excellency, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad," who
understands "the dynamics and the politics of world revolution."
Apparently, Obama
approves of these antics, because his attorney general, Eric Holder, dropped
charges against the New Black Panthers, even though they were caught on tape
allegedly intimidating Philadelphia voters in the 2008 elections. Naturally,
Holder's Department of Justice then lied
about its actions, covering up its political motivations.
Holder specifically
protected King Samir Shabazz, who now serves as national field marshal for the
New Black Panthers. Shabazz spearheads the Panthers' ambitious new plan
to "create inner city militaries that would go into nurseries and kill
white babies and murder white people in the street."
Let's hope this
"inner city military" is not what candidate Obama mysteriously
referred to in 2008 when he pledged, "We cannot continue to rely on our
military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set.
We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."
Imagine, for one
monstrous moment, the destructive potential of this burgeoning alliance between
the Obama-protected New Black Panthers, Obama's old Chicago associate Louis Farrakhan, and the genocidally obsessed Ahmadinejad. If
your blood didn't run cold, you weren't imagining hard enough.
A Tsunami of Voter Fraud
On June 15, 2012, Obama
bypassed Congress and issued de facto amnesty to hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens. Suddenly, whole new
vistas of voter fraud opened up to the Democrats. Admittedly, they've got to
ramp up quickly for November, but this gang should prove up to the challenge.
Helping matters along,
Holder is busy suing
states that require photo ID to vote and attempting to disenfranchise the military. Together, these well-coordinated efforts should
provide Obama with the means to pull off staggering amounts of voter fraud.
"By Any Means Necessary"
If all else fails, Obama
and his investors may be prepared to keep power "By Any Means Necessary."
This information comes from an uncannily predictive website called The Ulsterman Report. Those who have followed its fascinating
interviews over the last couple of years with two anonymous sources, Wall Street
Insider and White House Insider, have seen its scoops confirmed again and
again.
Well over a year ahead
of any other media, The Ulsterman Report was informing readers that Valerie
Jarrett ran the White House and that Obama was strangely disengaged from the
actual tasks of governing. It predicted the emergence of obscure figures --
Kamala D. Harris, who's now attorney general of California, and her
brother-in-law, Tony West, the newly named acting associate attorney general at
the Department of Justice, who's being groomed as Holder's successor.
Most crucially, shortly
after the bin Laden operation, the Ulsterman Report revealed that Valerie
Jarrett had canceled three previous bin Laden raids. That information now has
been confirmed by Richard Miniter in his book,
Leading
from Behind: The Reluctant President and the Advisors Who Decide for Him.
Recently, a source known
as Military Insider (MI) met with Ulsterman (UM) at the urging of Wall Street
Insider (WSI) to issue a warning. A section of their conversation follows below:
MI: Approximately two years ago...not quite two years ago...I
received information pertaining to an election contingency plan. For 2012.
After the 2010 elections there were particular operatives...specific to the
Obama administration and Democratic Party leadership...indicating an
overwhelming need to secure a second term for President Obama. That document's
title was...(pauses)
WSI: He can be trusted - I
give you my word. Please proceed.
MI: That document's title
was "By Any Means Necessary". It was unofficial - but we know it came
directly from channels specific to the administration. We confirmed that.
UM: What channels? Who are
you talking about?
MI: We believe it to have been authored by Mr.
Sunstein. Reviewed and approved by Valerie Jarrett. Preparations for implementation
are being done in part by Mr. Leo Gerard coordinating with...with high ranking
officials within the Department of Justice, Homeland Security...and...the U.S.
military.
We could dismiss the
anonymous Military Insider's warning as overheated, unsourced hysteria. Or we
could examine it as one more piece of evidence to place alongside all the
evidence I've described above.
The greatest asset of
Obama and his investors has been their warp-speed audacity. We're too stunned
to believe what's happening in front of our eyes, and too embarrassed to
mention it. Who wants to speak up and be ridiculed as an unhinged paranoid,
marching with the tinfoil hat brigade?
But our best bet --
perhaps our only bet -- is to frankly confront this ugly reality. As Iran
prepares to go nuclear and the global economy teeters, any number of
"national emergencies" can suddenly erupt, demanding unprecedented
measures by Obama to "save" us. We must be prepared with skepticism,
outrage, and defiance of any actions to deprive us of our Constitutional
rights.
America remains the last
best hope on earth. And We the People must keep our power, by any means
necessary.
correction:
erroneous link to executive orders removed
correction:
reference to work brigades and relocation centers removed
correction:
number of executive orders issued by Obama changed to 135
Write Stella Paul at
stellapundit@aol.com.